User talk:Mooredrrob

Speedy deletion nomination of Ubvric Rosetta Stone
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Ubvric Rosetta Stone, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Favonian (talk) 20:26, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I noted the "hangon" tag you applied to the above-captioned article and the assertions you made within the body of the article and on the talk page. A Google search reveals that the sum total of Internet information on this topic appears to be posts in a single blog; I suggest you find considerably more in the way of reliable sources to back your assertions before attempting to reconstitute this article.  Best of luck with your future contributions.  Accounting4Taste: talk 02:28, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ubvric Rosetta Stone
A tag has been placed on Ubvric Rosetta Stone requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Wuh Wuz  Dat  00:44, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

You must supply sources
You may consider it "obfuscation", but the rules are very clear, and are stated here. Claims such as those you make about this alleged artefact must be referenced. That is, you (that's you, not anyone else - the onus is on an editor to prove that article content is reported elsewhere) must supply references to reliable sources to establish the verifiable nature of the content of articles. Do that, and the article might stay. Don't, and it will be deleted. Repeat the article and include insults toward WP editors (of which by definition you are one), and your editing privileges may be suspended. Please feel free to leave me a message on my talkpage if you'd like more information on citing sources. Please also remember that WP is not a vehicle for spreading The Truth Tonywalton Talk 01:36, 2 January 2010 (UTC)