User talk:Moosehadley

edits
The info is including is sourced. And a claim that 50,000 were killed without a citation is problematic and deserves to be tagged. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1012:B066:F174:F969:4E90:8BCB:E85A (talk) 00:12, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Ah I see, it appears I made a serious mistake by reverting your edit. I apologize. I've reinstated it and striked the warnings.
 *  Moose  hadley  00:16, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
 * No worries, thanks for your response — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1012:B066:F174:F969:4E90:8BCB:E85A (talk) 00:16, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

Jack elam
You deleted my contribution to his page when I added in the fact he was in the twilight zone in 1961 rolled called the crazy man "look it up that was what the name of roll was" in the episode will the real Martian please stand up. Why did you do this? Rob723 (talk) 05:19, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
 * I misinterpreted your edit as vandalism, I apologize. I've reinstated your edit and I will strike the warning.  Moose  hadley  06:30, 4 January 2019 (UTC)

About your WP:A7 nomination of the article Sam Sloan
Hi Moosehadley, and thank you again for your contributions. I am puzzled by your nomination of this article for WP:A7 speedy deletion (which I declined. The subject of the article would appear to pass any number of tests for Notability. Did you intend to tag the article as including unreliable references and undue use of primary sources? In my opinion it does. Please let me know if I can assist you in any way at all about this, or in any way about the English language Wikipedia. Pete AU aka --Shirt58 (talk) 10:31, 5 April 2019 (UTC)