User talk:Moosemcghee

May 2010
Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Sarah Lancaster, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Logical Fuzz (talk) 02:17, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

June 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Sarah Lancaster. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Logical Fuzz (talk) 20:35, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Sarah Lancaster, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. ''Note: This is the 3rd time you are being warned about removing the photo at Sarah Lancaster without an explanation. Bring up your issues on the talk page. Future removal of the photo will be treated as vandalism.'' Logical Fuzz (talk) 22:17, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

Picture is inaccurate Moosemcghee (talk) 16:57, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

Sarah Lancaster image
I see you are continuing to remove the picture from the Sarah Lancaster article despite being warned above. There is nothing I can see that is "inaccurate" about the picture: it is indeed of Sarah Lancaster. As Logical Fuzz said above, if there is a good reason to remove the picture, that's fine, but please discuss why on the article's talk page at Talk: Sarah Lancaster. If you continue to remove the picture without explaining what is "inaccurate" about it, your changes will be reverted again and may be treated as vandalism. Thank you. -Phoenixrod (talk) 20:55, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

I have reverted your image addition for now. I agree it's a better photo, and once you establish its copyright status as described below on this page, we can put it back into the article. But for now, we can't use it if there's a possibility that we don't have the right. -Phoenixrod (talk) 03:52, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Lancaster44.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Lancaster44.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:06, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Lancaster44.jpg
A tag has been placed on File:Lancaster44.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  Ron h jones (Talk) 23:38, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

File:Sarah Lancaster Promo.jpg
You've uploaded File:Sarah Lancaster Promo.jpg, but it will be deleted. Non-free images are only acceptable on Wikipedia when we cannot possibly get a free one - not "I can't find one", but "cannot get". We can't go out and photograph dead people but for living actresses it shouldn't be too hard. The full details are at Non-free content. And you've been not to change the picture before. If you want a "better" one, take a better one yourself, or get Ms L's PR company to release a better one under a free license. See Requesting copyright permission for what that involves. Angus McLellan (Talk) 20:49, 6 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Thank you very much. Angus McLellan (Talk) 22:41, 7 October 2010 (UTC)