User talk:Mootros/Archives/2009/August

Talk:List of online backup services
Will you be starting an WP:RFC for Talk:List of online backup services, or shall I? -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 12:51, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Go for it. If you don't mind. Thanks! Mootros (talk) 13:02, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The second RFC that you created is a bit puzzling. That topic hasn't really been covered on the talk page and RFC generally is resorted to only when an impasse exists on topics that have been discussed.  The previous discussion was about notability requirements, not classification of the article.  -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 14:03, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I see. Sorry about the confusion. Perhaps I was not very explicit on this point. See:
 * Yes, that appears be exactly the issue here. A banner on the top does not make it automatically true and therefore notable!
 * I think, the entire problem stems from a mis-interpretation of the terms "stand alone list". I was trying to summaries this in the end in a new section. But yes, it has not been responded to in there. Cheers, for the effort. Mootros (talk) 23:03, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

test
Mootros (talk) 13:30, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

Capitalization
Please be aware that per WP:TITLE it will be "imprisonment" with a small i in article titles. Thank you. --  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 14:51, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks-- Done! Mootros (talk) 14:53, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Life imprisonment (Uruguay)


The article Life imprisonment (Uruguay) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Propose delete and merge of this article into Death Penalty

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RP459 (talk) 18:25, 29 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Go for it! Mootros (talk) 18:32, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
 * FYI Use_of_capital_punishment_by_nation lists the fact that Uruguay has abolished the death penalty by constitution.   RP459 (talk) 20:44, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Useful! Thanks for the information. Mootros (talk) 16:38, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Life imprisonment (Norway)


The article Life imprisonment (Norway) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * This article is at best misleading. It is referenced to a law that is still not in effect. Also it gets forvaring wrong. I.e. "forvaring" does not mean 21 years imprisonment like the article says. There are also longer imprisonment rules for war crimes etc.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rettetast (talk) 11:49, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your message Rettetast. Yes go for it, if you think it's beyond rescue. This article came from the following page, which I had completely restructured: Life_imprisonment Do you mind to just have a quick look through and check the Norway entry. Thanks! Mootros (talk) 13:25, 31 August 2009 (UTC)