User talk:Mora Hassan

Dear Mora Hasan: I saw you reverted my last edition, regarding the telegram of the German Consul-General in Palestine, as vandalism. If you pay attention, y let the reference, and it is an electronic book that you can easely find on internet. Here I give you the hole page about the text. Additionally, I did not change the last part of the paragraph because it was not mentioned in the edition of 2015. If you had that text, I really appreciate if you were so kind as to show that pages.

72 Nazi Germany and the Arab World, 1933–1944 presence, and the implementation of the Balfour Declaration in the form of the Jewish National Home as part of the injustice of the postwar settlement in the Middle East. It is doubtful that the majority of Arabs really understood the comprehensive nature of National Socialism’s racial world view, beyond its specific anti-Semitism and persecution of the Jews in Germany. Nor is it likely that most understood that the Nazi state would not be inclined to undermine European colonial rule over the Arab world. 38 At the same time, and with regard to the question of Palestine, many at least initially seemed to ignore the reality that the new Germany they admired so much was to a large degree responsible for the dramatic increase in the Jewish immigration into Palestine after 1933, a process that they adamantly opposed. In Palestine, the views of the Mufti of Jerusalem, Amin al-Husayni, were conveyed to Berlin by Heinrich Wolff, appointed as the German consul general in Jerusalem in November 1932, in a Telegram on March 31, 1933. The Mufti left little doubt about his disdain for democracy and for the Jews at this relatively early stage, and about his eagerness to establish some sort of common ground between Arab and German national interests. As was his tendency throughout the 1930s and 1940s, the Mufti claimed to speak for all Arabs and Muslims in his talks with Wolff. After his meeting with the Mufti, Wolff reported to Berlin: “Today the Mufti told me that Muslims inside and outside of Palestine greet the new regime in Germany, and hope for the spread of Fascist and anti-democratic state authority to other lands. Current Jewish influence on the economy and on politics is damaging, and must be resisted. . .” 39 Wolff again met with the Mufti and other Palestinian notables almost a month later at Nebi Musa, in the mountains near the Dead Sea. After proclaiming their sympathy and admiration for the new Germany, the Mufti and his colleagues expressed their approval of Hitler’s anti-Jewish policies, requesting only that the German government make every effort to prevent German Jews from reaching Palestine. 40 That there was some awareness among Arabs that the Germany to which they looked to for assistance was in fact a major cause of increased Jewish immigration into Palestine was not lost on the German Consul General in Jerusalem in his report to Berlin in October 1933: “The point of view can also move to the forefront, that the Arabs will begin to assign guilt to Germany for their unhappiness when they say that it is the Reich government that sends the Jews to this land.”41

März 1933. 24/33, 20. April 1933.
 * 38 See Wien, Iraqi Arab Nationalism, 7–8.
 * 39 PA: Pol.Abt. III, Politik 2-Palästina, Bd. I, DGK/Jerusalem an AA/Berlin, Telegramm Nr.5, 31.
 * 40 PA: Pol.Abt. IV-Kultur-Minderheiten, Nr.14, Bd. I, DGK/Jerusalem an AA/ Berlin, Nr.Polit.
 * 41 PA: Botschaft Rom, Politik 3-Palastina, Bd.l, DGK/Jerusalem an AA/Berlin, Nr.Unr. 2/33, 30. Oktober 1933. In his annual review for the year 1933, Consul-General Wolfe nevertheless dismissed the Arabs as generally unable to recognize that Nazi Jewish policy was partially responsible for the rapid increase in Jewish immigration in Palestine in 1933. See PA: Botschaft

شكرا جزيلا بكل صراحة Thanks very much. Yours sincerely JuanMRS (talk) 07:20, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

Arab Israeli conflict
Hi, please do not edit pages in this topic area until you have 500 edits. Re the above mentioned revert, which you described as vandalism, I do not see how you reached that conclusion. The reference you have reverted to is an unspecified sfn reference suggesting it was copied from some other article, I will try to track it down. Whereas the material you reverted seems on the face of it, to be correct. I will check, however.

Thank you. Selfstudier (talk) 11:28, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

I have now checked and the material you reverted as "vandalism" was correct, while the material you reverted to was false. Please do not do this again. Thank you. Selfstudier (talk) 12:58, 19 December 2021 (UTC)