User talk:Morantes

word. Jespi06 (talk) 00:25, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Gnovisjournal


A tag has been placed on Gnovisjournal requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Crusio (talk) 07:27, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

Occupy california
Hello. It doesn't appear your article Occupy california really meets the general notability guideline for inclusion in the encyclopedia. For it to meet this, it needs reliable references of information that make it worth including, such as news article and third-party sources talking about it. I see you have it in your sandbox, and that is probably the best place for it until you fully get the article written. Until you expand and develop your article, try and keep it in your user space until it is developed. For now, I am going to redirect the article to List of Occupy movement protest locations in California, where the current protests are the most likely search term. Look around Wikipedia starting at the guideline I linked to you and see how you can improve on articles. Your first article may help too. If you need something, let me know. — Moe   ε  00:30, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

Moe, Hello. I want to clarify some points with you that might shed some light, I have been working on this article in my sandbox in order to have a work space to allow myself to polish something nice for the wiki community, I figure better start there than start a page and adjust while its "live". Second, I didnt want to continue work on something, upload it and realize the bots or community members quickly knocked it down for being too put together in one fell swoop. Third, I was under the impression the larger community would assist in providing other useful information which is why some articles dont start off so exhaustive. Fourth, my article provided a historical context for the occupy movement in california, grant it, I focused on one part of the great state but given the nature of wikipedia, I feel as though i was safe to assume, the larger community would contribute to their respective citys/components in the article.The coverage on the event was widespread throughout the state in local media and syndicated stations across. So my question is, was i wrong to think this way? and if its not suited for its own page where would you see this content fall under. Thanks ahead for your reply.
 * Hello, sorry for the late reply. If you want me to reply faster, visit my talk page and I would probably reply to you a lot sooner.
 * I don't think you have to worry about the community knocking down something that is too put together, that would actually be more acceptable to keep than a short or poorly sourced article. The community would expand and improve on articles depending on its accessibility. Your article didn't really link to any other pages across Wikipedia, which is why others probably didn't notice it. For now, if you want to add a short blurb about the movement, you could try adding referenced information to the University of California at Santa Cruz article in an appropriate section, where editors would be likely to expand on it. You need reliable sources of information to put a mention of the event there. If you need help, I am willing to help you add the information on the article, but you would need to write proposed content to add to the article (the entire article that was at Occupy california is too expansive and unreferenced for the University article itself). Once you write what you think should be on the article, I can help you reference it and move it to the University article if you like. Regards, — Moe   ε  02:15, 7 December 2011 (UTC)