User talk:Morbital

License tagging for Image:Whitecapskitaway.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Whitecapskitaway.png. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 23:13, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Logos
Permission to use on Wikipedia is not sufficient. Images must be freely licensed. No sports club would ever freely license their logo as it would allow others to use it commercially. You also have the kit sponsor in the upper left corner, and the team badge in the top right, which are both unfree. ed g2s &bull; talk 12:17, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Please read WP:FU before throwing any more insults my way (see also WP:NPA). For the article on Umbro the logo is a significant part of the company - and adds significantly to the encyclopaedic value of the article, however we try to avoid unfree images wherever possible. The team colours are an important part of the team's identity, but that they have a kit and team logo on their shirt is nothing special, and can be mentioned in the article if deemed particularly significant. ed g2s &bull; talk 14:53, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
 * If you want to contest this further please bring it up at WT:FU and Template talk:Football kit, where consensus has been reached in the past on this issue. ed g2s &bull; talk 14:57, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
 * The kit cannot contain any logos, including the club logo, which is copyrighted. These are not released under a free license, which means that third parties can't use them for commercial purposes or make derivative works. ed g2s &bull; talk 11:39, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

You can sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ) ed g2s &bull; talk 11:41, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism warning
Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Jenolen   speak it!  09:01, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Oldcapslogo.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Oldcapslogo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:43, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:86erslogo.gif
This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:86erslogo.gif. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:17, 6 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 18:17, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Originalcapslogo.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Originalcapslogo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:15, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Originalcapslogo.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Originalcapslogo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 08:09, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Vancouver-Whitecaps-FC-Logo.svg
Thanks for uploading Image:Vancouver-Whitecaps-FC-Logo.svg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check


 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
 * That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 05:10, 4 November 2008 (UTC)