User talk:Moreisgood1

Speedy deletion nomination of World Taekwondo Demonstration Team


A tag has been placed on World Taekwondo Demonstration Team requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, society, or group that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Liz Read! Talk! 23:09, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of World Taekwondo Demonstration Team


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, World Taekwondo Demonstration Team, was deleted as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Girth Summit  (blether) 08:22, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

Advice
Hi - the content of that recreated article had nothing to do with the subject, it was commentary about the deletion of the previous version. Please don't do that in article space, it is disruptive. If you want to write about that subject, I'd advise you to work up an article in draft space (see WP:DRAFT) and submit it to WP:AFC. You will need reliable, independent sources that give the subject significant depth of coverage: WP:GNG is worth reading. Best Girth Summit  (blether)  08:25, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
 * I would guess it's dependent on how much time you have for a project. Are you keen or willing to be involved in some sort of "general cleanup" on Wikipedia? Suppose it's accepted that you have some rogue admins on here. Not saying they should be tracked down however guess that would be doable. How is it that a site (Wikipedia or wp) could have been online this long with such giant flaws? Further the principles this site adopts have been co-opted, corrupted etc. and nothing is done. Moreisgood1 (talk) 08:27, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
 * To be honest, I don't really understand what you are talking about. However, if you make another unfounded accusation that another editor is corrupt, I will block your account from editing. Your account is two weeks old, and you have made very few edits - you should be trying to learn the ropes. Girth Summit  (blether)  08:34, 3 July 2021 (UTC)