User talk:Morel

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on. Again, welcome! Abductive (reasoning) 12:43, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Proposed deletion of Studia Humaniora Tartuensia


The article Studia Humaniora Tartuensia has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * A search for references failed to find significant coverage in reliable sources to comply with notability requirements. This included web searches for news coverage, books, and journals, which can be seen from the following links: Studia Humaniora Tartuensia – news, books, scholar Consequently, this article is about a subject that appears to lack sufficient notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Abductive (reasoning) 12:43, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category talk:Flemish Classical scholars


A tag has been placed on Category talk:Flemish Classical scholars, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

See talk page comment!!

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:22, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

My reversion
Thanks for reverting that. I was trying to do it myself but I was on the fifth captcha. 71.163.243.232 (talk) 00:37, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
 * You're welcome!--Morel (talk) 21:41, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

Rollback
I have granted rollback rights to your account. After a review of some of your contributions, I believe you can be trusted to use rollback for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see New admin school/Rollback and Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, just let me know and I will remove it. Good luck and thanks. —Tom Morris (talk) 14:20, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I will certainly use these rights for reverting vandalism only.--Morel (talk) 16:10, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

Thank you
I just wanted to say thanks for the quick reverts of the vandalism on my talk page. -- Ed (Edgar181) 16:16, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
 * You're welcome!--Morel (talk) 21:41, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

Trade in the Mayan civilization
Per your request in the edit summary here I restored back to here Hoping this is the correct version. Darkness Shines (talk) 18:25, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much!--Morel (talk) 18:31, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

Merkin edits
Hello, I took the liberty of tagging User talk:69annieapple69 with a level 3 joke warning for their Merkin edits. Have a good day.Trilobitealive (talk) 03:12, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

This is the page where joke warning templates are found if you need them: Template messages/User talk namespace. Trilobitealive (talk) 03:14, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks! I will try to use them when necessary.--Morel (talk) 10:10, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

Talk:Wim Crusio
Hi, I wonder why you self-reverted there. Talk pages are specifically not intended to vent one's opinion about the subject of an article (see WP:TALK), let alone this kind of attacks. Just curious. --Guillaume2303 (talk) 17:04, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I must have been lost for a moment. It's probably because I usually try to avoid reverting user talk pages unless I see obvious vandalism. I now see that this comment may have been reverted.--Morel (talk) 17:07, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
 * It's not a user talk page, but an article talk page, being attacked by an IP troll. --Guillaume2303 (talk) 17:12, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes, sorry, my fault.--Morel (talk) 17:14, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
 * No prob. :-) --Guillaume2303 (talk) 17:15, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

March 2012
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Ministry of Magic. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Elizium23 (talk) 23:31, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
 * An anonymous user repeatedly included the sentence "They rape her and she is later rescued by Dumbledore." Although "supported" by two citations ( and ), I consider this as vandalism, as it presents an interpretation of the situation, and no rape is mentioned in the text.--Morel (talk) 00:54, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Studia Humaniora Tartuensia for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Studia Humaniora Tartuensia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Studia Humaniora Tartuensia until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Randykitty (talk) 16:57, 19 December 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Studia Humaniora Tartuensia for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Studia Humaniora Tartuensia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Studia Humaniora Tartuensia & until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Randykitty (talk) 09:28, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

The 1000 Challenge (Baltic)
Hi. I see you are listed as a member of a WikiProject of a Baltic state. I was wondering if anybody who actively works on Estonian, Lithuanian or Latvian articles, would be interested in launching your own The 1000 Challenge (Baltic), based on the The 1000 Challenge (Nordic) and The 10,000 Challenge. The idea would be to try to bring about 1000 article improvements and creations on this region as an enjoyable challenge and potentially things like National Contests with prizes. If you'd be interested and think it's something you might regularly contribute to, comment and sign up at Talk:Baltic states. If there is interest we can move this to a project somewhere and set something up, thanks. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:26, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

Europe 10,000 Challenge invite
Hi. The WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:09, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

Circe Merge
Hi, a long time ago you took part in discussing a merge proposal at Talk:Circe the result of which was not to merge the larger Circe in the Arts with it. Another editor has now made that merge without consensus and reopened the discussion. Since you were a dissenting party originally, you may care to make a comment here. Sweetpool50 (talk) 01:33, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Pablo Miller
The article Pablo Miller has been proposed for deletion. As you suggested the article at User:Morel/sandbox, you might like to contribute to the discussion. Mock wurzel soup (talk) 16:16, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)