User talk:Morepowa

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. -- Finngall  talk  16:16, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Snorehole


The article Snorehole has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Wikipedia is not a dictionary.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a message on my talk page. @ 16:39, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Snorehole
I have nominated Snorehole, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Snorehole. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a message on my talk page. @ 23:18, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

Hey. Wanna go on record here. It's not going to survive here on Wikipedia on account of that it's a dictionary definition of a neologism, but ya know what? I like it. Even if "I like it" doesn't hold water at all in the deletion discussion, it's something to put a grin on my face. So here, have a barnstar.

By the by, your best bet would probably be the Urban Dictionary for this one. They've actually got better standards since I started playing with it seven years ago, but it's worth a shot if anything. -- Dennis The Tiger  (Rawr and stuff) 15:57, 28 August 2009 (UTC)