User talk:Morgan-weta

June 2018
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Weta has been reverted. Your edit here to Weta was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c_n0mbpX4KE) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 21:13, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

Robert McLachlan (mathematician), moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Robert McLachlan (mathematician),, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 23:41, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Robert McLachlan (mathematician) (April 15)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by JavaHurricane were:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Robert McLachlan (mathematician) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Robert McLachlan (mathematician), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Robert_McLachlan_(mathematician) Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:JavaHurricane&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Robert_McLachlan_(mathematician) reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

 Java Hurricane  14:27, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

Aola Richards moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Aola Richards, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:38, 22 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Hi, the reason why I've moved this to drafts is that notability has not been shown, and therefore the article would have been a deletion candidate had it remained in the main space.
 * Notability can be established in one of two ways: either the person is inherently notable, in this case as an eminent scientist, but I cannot see anything in the career details to suggest that; feel free to review the criteria at WP:NACADEMIC and let me know if you think I got that wrong.
 * The other way is by the general notability route, per WP:GNG, which requires significant coverage in multiple independent and reliable secondary sources. Of the sources cited, the first half a dozen offer only the barest of passing mentions, if even that, and the last half a dozen seem to be scientific papers mostly authored by the article subject herself, which doesn't really help (we need to see what others have said about her, not what she herself has said). As it stands, I didn't see one source that meets the GNG criteria, although again I'm happy to be proven wrong.
 * There is also the problem of missing referencing, with too much of the content being unsupported.
 * If you can add better sources and more citations, to address both these points (notability and verifiability), please do so, and you are then welcome to submit the draft for pre-publication review by clicking on the blue 'submit' button. Thanks, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:46, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your message. Although I cannot determine that this person is inherently notable, compared to other entomologists with their own wiki page one can see she contributed at least as much. Morgan-weta (talk) 03:55, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aola Richards has been accepted
 Aola Richards, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Aola_Richards help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! MurielMary (talk) 09:53, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Creating stubs on insects
Please try to avoid creating stubs on taxa, like you did at Micropathus, even if you intend to expand them later. They are unhelpful to the reader. Thanks, Edward-Woodrow :) [ talk ] 12:25, 11 August 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)