User talk:MorganM21

Welcome!
Hello, MorganM21, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page John Safran did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to  The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Introduction tutorial
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome. HiLo48 (talk) 23:07, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

The edit correction I made was a fact. MorganM21 (talk) 15:53, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi, you didn't provide any source for your change though and it failed verification with the existing citations in the article. That's why and I reverted your edits. Please have a look at WP:VERIFY and WP:RS. NJD-DE (talk) 16:00, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

January 2021
Hello, I'm Njd-de. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, John Safran, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. NJD-DE (talk) 15:45, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

The source is from the living person who is being referred to MorganM21 (talk) 16:02, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at John Safran, you may be blocked from editing. Your change is still not sourced and fails verification with the current inline citation. NJD-DE (talk) 16:17, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

The content in the citation is factually incorrect MorganM21 (talk) 16:37, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Ok, then tell us a reliable source that proves your claim. Until then the current text and citation shall remain in the article. NJD-DE (talk) 16:42, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

Is the living person being referred to reliable enough? MorganM21 (talk) 16:45, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
 * As in you being one of the persons referred to or you having spoken with one of them ? No that wouldn't qualify. Please have a look at WP:RS to see what is being called reliable source here. Anything you want to add or change has to be published and verifiable. It's not enough to know about it personally. NJD-DE (talk) 19:50, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

Ok then since such standards are being applied, may it go on the record that what was written was absolute Bollocks. MorganM21 (talk) 09:43, 2 March 2021 (UTC)