User talk:Morganromero3/sandbox

Peer Review
Overall, I think your article does well in explaining the topic of the living wage. It is concise yet informative and stays neutral throughout. It includes arguments from both sides of the spectrum and has reliable sources. I think it might be more beneficial if you found scholarly sources to use, but I think the sources you have are fine. However, I noticed that most of your first paragraph was plagiarized from your sources. You need to put these sentences in your own words or else your edits will get taken down. This led to uncommon words like "remuneration" being included in your article, making it harder for the reader to understand what the living wage is. I also feel like you could add another sentence for the concerns and opposition to the living wage in order to make the coverage of both opinions on the living wage more developed and balanced. Johnvalenti (talk) 21:56, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

-- Response --

Thank you for your feedback, John! I reworked my first paragraph so that it reflects my own words and added some citations as well. In addition, I added two more sentences to the section that details the opposing side to a living wage implementation. Overall, I also shifted my language to be more accessible so that it is without jargon. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Morganromero3 (talk • contribs) 23:36, 25 March 2020 (UTC)