User talk:Morningtv13

November 2014
Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Good Morning America, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.  livelikemusic  my talk page! 21:00, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Good Morning America, you may be blocked from editing.  livelikemusic  my talk page! 17:48, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Today (U.S. TV program).  livelikemusic  my talk page! 00:12, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Today (U.S. TV program). Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you.  livelikemusic  my talk page! 02:05, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

DASH
Wikipedia changed the rules way before you became an editor. See WP:DASH for more information. You have violated the three revert rule, and I will report you if you keep vandalizing Wikipedia.  Corkythehornetfan   (Talk)  02:43, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

Sorry but Al had been listed since the creation of the page. Why did no one remove it until now then?? He is part of the team and a presenter and TODAY Show page list him as a co-Host of third Hour. Morningtv13 (talk) 02:44, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Please pay attention to the change that is being made, and stop blindly reverting. Al Roker is not being removed from the article; all that is being changed now is a hyphen to an ndash in his entry per MOS:DASH.   Dwpaul   Talk   02:48, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
 * you should removed Ginger Zee then from the good Morning America page. Be fair  thenMorningtv13 (talk) 02:50, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Pay attention, please. Al Roker is not being removed from the article where you inserted his name.  Dwpaul   Talk   02:52, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
 * I mean being removed from the staring section.. of the page. If you going to do that then remove Ginger Zee from the staring section Morningtv13 (talk) 03:00, 23 November 2014 (UTC) on the GMA Page as well
 * What do you mean by the "staring section"? If you mean the list of "presenters" in the infobox at the start of the article, his name is listed there, and has been through the last half an hour of repeated reversions of an en dash instead of a hyphen in his entry, to bring it into compliance with MOS:DASH.  Dwpaul   Talk   03:08, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

User Page
Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "Morningtv13", may not meet Wikipedia's username policy. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username, or you may simply create a new account for editing. Thank you. VViking Talk Edits 01:38, 26 November 2014 (UTC) How do i change my username? Morningtv13 (talk) 15:39, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Click on the highlighted link change of username in the first sentence above for instructions. (See Venues on the linked page for the locations where you can request a change, depending on whether the desired name is already taken.) Dwpaul  Talk   16:08, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Newer Photo of NBC Natalie Morales.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Newer Photo of NBC Natalie Morales.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 04:07, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Newer Photo of NBC Natalie Morales.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Newer Photo of NBC Natalie Morales.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  Dwpaul  Talk   04:13, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

WP:LISTPEOPLE
So, do you not understand the what WP:LISTPEOPLE is saying? It says: A person may be included in a list of people if all the following requirements are met:
 * The person meets the Wikipedia notability requirement. An exception to this requirement may be made if the person is famous for a specific event, the notability requirement need not be met. If a person in a list does not have a Wikipedia article about them, a citation (or link to another article) must be provided to: a) establish their membership in the list's group; and b) to establish their notability on either BLP1E or BIO1E.
 * The person's membership in the list's group is established by reliable sources.

I'm not sure as to why you are not understanding it, but I'm tired of reverting your edits and you still wanting to do what you think is right. WP:WikiProject Television Stations has decided that they must meet the WP:LISTPEOPLE, and if they don't meet on of the following, then they shouldn't be in the article. Sandy Hill needs reliable sources in order for her name to be included, since she doesn't have a Wikipedia article.  Corkythehornetfan   (Talk)  21:22, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

From GMA website: http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/photos/good-morning-america-anchors-years-9216683/image-9216583 Morningtv13 (talk) 22:02, 26 November 2014 (UTC) there lot of places on the internet, books, that mention Sandy as being the coo-anchor and photos of her on the set, et,c. This photo above was also posted on GMA Facebook page awhile back. Joan Lunden replaced sandy hill. I don't know why she doesn't have a wiki article but that doesn't mean anything really. but it common knowledge that sandy replaced by Joan. There a video here of sandy at GMA 20th Anniversary from 95, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W0i97UMbPGI Morningtv13 (talk) 22:02, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
 * 1) YouTube is not a reliable source 2) You'll need more than just a primary source to have her listed in the article. It isn't common knowledge, if a person didn't watch the show back in the 70s/80s. Why should I care, or anyone else for that matter, care who anchored the show back in the late 70s? Plus, you still didn't answer my question: Do you understand what WP:LISTPEOPLE says? She doesn't have an article and there are not any reliable sources to back it up. Until those are given, then Ms. Hill should not be listed.  Corkythehornetfan   (Talk)  22:12, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

It obvious you didn't watch it. There really no point in trying to reason with you peoples. It is of GMA 20th anniversary and sandy is in it and been mentioned as a former co-Host many times before. I EVEN gave you a photo form the GMA Website that says she was co-anchor form 1977-1980. Morningtv13 (talk) 22:17, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
 * (edit conflict) What is trying to help you understand is that it doesn't matter how many times Sandy was mentioned on-the-air on GMA, or how many pictures on the GMA Web site you can point to. To make a statement of fact here on Wikipedia, particularly with regard to biography, we need citations of independent, reliable sources that demonstrate verifiably that something is a fact.  In this case, unless such evidence is provided as a citation with the entry and/or an existing Wikipedia article linked from the entry contains such evidence, we cannot include Sandy's name in the list.  These are core policies of Wikipedia, and you really must take the time to understand them if you are going to continue editing here at all.  Dwpaul   Talk   22:26, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

Okay here a Newspaper article form 1978: http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=336&dat=19780105&id=vW1TAAAAIBAJ&sjid=sYUDAAAAIBAJ&pg=7134,1146061 Morningtv13 (talk) 22:24, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
 * That establishes that as of January 1978, she was a co-anchor of GMA, and it's certainly a step in the right direction. But I would keep looking for something that reflects that she was a co-anchor from 1977 to 1980, since that is what you are claiming. This citation cannot do that, because it was written before 1980.  Maybe an article announcing her departure from the show.  Dwpaul   Talk   22:33, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

Well Joan Lunden joined in 1980 and Nancy Dussault left in 1977 so... Morningtv13 (talk) 22:57, 26 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Right. But establishing those two facts doesn't allow the reader to verifiably determine who was co-anchor from 1977 to 1980.  We need a citation of at least one independent, reliable source that establishes that Sandy was co-anchor after Dussault and before Lunden.  As I said, an announcement of Sandy's departure (and probably Lunden's arrival) is most likely to do that.  Dwpaul   Talk   23:02, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

March 2015
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. ''You have received several warnings for your behavior. If you continue, you will be blocked.'' IPadPerson (talk) 18:55, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Natalie Morales. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount and can lead to a block, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. Amaury (talk) 19:21, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Savannah Guthrie edit war
Your recent editing history at Savannah Guthrie shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Please note that I also added this template to User talk:IPadPerson / FFM784 (talk) 20:51, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Savannah Guthrie as NBC News Chief Legal Correspondent
You just reverted my edit to Savannah Guthrie without comment. Please look at this current bio: https://www.nbcumv.com/talent/savannah-guthrie/bios_read_more?show=151259 The first sentence reads, "Savannah Guthrie is the co-anchor of NBC News' "Today." She also serves as NBC News Chief Legal Correspondent." Please tell me if you would permit me to re-add my earlier changes. Thanks / FFM784 (talk) 21:20, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Natalie Morales edit war
Your recent editing history at Natalie Morales shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Please note that I also added this template to User talk:IPadPerson / FFM784 (talk) 21:40, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

March 2015
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Republic (political organisation), you may be blocked from editing. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 13:52, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 days for edit warring, as you did at Natalie Morales. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Guerillero &#124;  Parlez Moi  03:57, 26 March 2015 (UTC)