User talk:Morrigan Witchcreed

Welcome!
Hi Morrigan Witchcreed! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Happy editing! S Philbrick (Talk)  01:09, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia
You did not identify the source of the material in your edit. It appears to be House of Night. Copying within Wikipedia is acceptable but it must be attributed.

This type of edit does get picked up by Copy Patrol and a good edit summary helps to make sure we don't accidentally revert it. However, for future use, would you note the best practices wording as outlined at Copying_within_Wikipedia? In particular, linking to the source article and adding the phrase "see that page's history for attribution" helps ensure that proper attribution is preserved.

While best practices are that attribution should be added to the edit summary at the time the edit is made, the linked article on best practices describes the appropriate steps to add attribution after the fact. I have done so for you this time, but hope you will follow best practices yourself next time.

I've noticed that this guideline is not very well known, even among editors with tens of thousands of edits, so it isn't surprising that I point this out to some veteran editors, but there are some t's that need to be crossed. S Philbrick  (Talk)  01:09, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia
You did not identify the source of the material in your edit. It appears to be House of Night. Copying within Wikipedia is acceptable but it must be attributed.

This type of edit does get picked up by Copy Patrol and a good edit summary helps to make sure we don't accidentally revert it. However, for future use, would you note the best practices wording as outlined at Copying_within_Wikipedia? In particular, linking to the source article and adding the phrase "see that page's history for attribution" helps ensure that proper attribution is preserved.

While best practices are that attribution should be added to the edit summary at the time the edit is made, the linked article on best practices describes the appropriate steps to add attribution after the fact. I have done so for you this time, but hope you will follow best practices yourself next time.

I've noticed that this guideline is not very well known, even among editors with tens of thousands of edits, so it isn't surprising that I point this out to some veteran editors, but there are some t's that need to be crossed. S Philbrick  (Talk)  01:28, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

Edits on Frostbite (Mead novel)
Hello, I've reverted your edits on the page Frostbite (Mead novel). This is an encyclopedia. The plot section is supposed to be simple and easy to understand. This means staying way from phrases such as  mystical contrivance or embarking on a journey to rendezvous with. Please avoid adding unnecessary wording that makes the plot section more complicated than it needs to be. Thank you --  Cosmic6811  🍁 ( T ·  C ) 23:47, 19 December 2023 (UTC)