User talk:Moses2015

Welcome!

Hello, Moses2015, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, your edit to Iraq–Pakistan relations does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or,   to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Help me!
This is Moses2015. Last week I made several revisions to the grammar of the article about Iraq-Pakistan relations. I made these changes because Wikipedia posted a box at the top of the page that said the article needed to be revised for grammar, tone, and repetitions. A few days later I received a message from Usertalk that said my revised version of the article didn't conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy. I don't think the subjective point of view the article gives is something I'm responsible for. I only edited a lot of what I thought were grammar errors. Several days after I received that message, I saw that someone had undid all of my revisions. I don't think that all of my revisions were wrong or unnecessary. If the article needs to be revised for grammar, tone, and repetitions, why has this happened? Can someone help me identify everything that needs to be changed in this article? Please help me with... Grammar, tone, repetitions, and neutral point of view

Moses2015 (talk) 15:35, 31 March 2015 (UTC)Moses2015
 * Moses2015, it was an IP editor that undid your revisions. They did this without leaving an edit summary, so I am unsure why they did it. However, your edits look constructive so I am reinstating them. In the future, should you have questions about an edit you made (or someone else's) it's a good idea to take it to the talk page of the article in question - this allows more people to see and respond to it. If you want more help, stop by the Teahouse, the IRC channel, or the help desk to ask someone for assistance. Primefac (talk) 15:40, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of SermonSearch.com


A tag has been placed on SermonSearch.com, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — BranStark (talk) 10:29, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of List of conflicts by duration for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of conflicts by duration is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of conflicts by duration until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sakiv (talk) 18:47, 12 January 2022 (UTC)