User talk:Mosmof

NYCFC
Shouldn't the team nick name come from the fans? Because that's how teams get their nick names — Preceding unsigned comment added by Only1bigc (talk • contribs) 18:27, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
 * True, but the smurfs did come from the fans. You don't get to pick your own nickname, someone gives it to u. The surfs was given by all the other mls teams, because of their light blue smurf like shirts. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leeds Unit (talk • contribs) 19:28, 9 June 2015‎
 * @ Wherever it came from, it needs to be verifiable with an independent, reliable secondary source. And we generally don't include pejorative nicknames, like the one included, in the infobox. Please remember to cite sources for your edits. Mosmof (talk) 19:35, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 26 January
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:24, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
 * On the Robbie Rogers page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=644207994 your edit] caused an unnamed parameter error (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F644207994%7CRobbie Rogers%5D%5D Ask for help])

Liverpool FC
Hi Mosmof, Could i just inquire about the reasons as to why you constantly remove my contributions to the 'rivalries' section Liverpool FC page? You did say it was my POV but It's actually a factual account complete with (though incorrectly inserted) cited reference. The overall section on the rivalries is miss leading to the casual reader as it is, as there really should be a 'citation needed' insert at the end of the "rivalry intensified after Manchester Utd became the first English team to win a European cup" line. To say Liverpool's four European cup wins coincided with their domination of English football is a fact bore out by their Honours list in the same article aswell as my referenced add-on. I do think the overall section is miss leading to the casual reader without it.Richie bedfellows (talk) 09:06, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Hi, thanks for leaving a message. My thinking is that "domination" is a little bit of a peacock term and the reader would be served better by simply stating the numbers (and looking at that passage again, I should probably edit the part about Manchester United "dominating" English football as well.


 * FYI, this edit broke the formatting on the page - when you have a line break followed by a period, it messes up the rest of the line.


 * Again, thanks - let me know if my latest edit works for you. Mosmof (talk) 16:28, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Hi, thank you for the prompt response and the appropriate re-editing.Also apologies for the mix-up with the format. Just one more point, i do also feel the line mentioned about the rivalry intensifying in the 60's after Manchester Utd's European cup win is also a little dubious and slightly miss-leading to the casual reader. I do feel if this is the case then it either needs a citation or i could reference claims that the rivalry actually intensified in the 1970's after Liverpool started their successful period with their first of their eleven league titles in that period. thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Richie bedfellows (talk • contribs) 18:52, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Coop City
Coop City is not a police force, just look at their own website. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.136.236.207 (talk) 19:48, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
 * There's nothing indicating they're not a private police force. In fact, their badge features the words "N.Y. POLICE" and their Twitter handle is titled "Co-Op City Police" and its website features a logo with the word "community policing at its finest". So yeah, if we go by their own description, CC Public Safety is indeed a police force. Mosmof (talk) 20:27, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Question regarding citing sources
What is the best way to cite information if it is from a book, which I can't find as an e-book to be read online? Is it better off just to leave off wiki if that's the case? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.6.227.50 (talk • contribs) 21:36, 31 January 2015‎
 * Books are certainly welcome - you can read more about citing sources at WP:CITE (this section will show you what information to include), and the Cite book template is useful for organizing the source information. Also, sometimes (but not always), you can use books.google.com to link to specific pages in books. Hope this helps. Mosmof (talk) 04:55, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Pablo Aimar
Hi there MOSMOF, from Portugal,

I have started a WP:FOOTY I discussion, I am 99,99999999999% sure that what you and the other user are doing in this article is wrong (if you link a WP article more than once it's overlinking, period), but let's wait for more opinions.

Also, if you two were correct, why wikilink only River Plate and not the other club from Malaysia? And I don't see the need to write "free agent" in the introduction because the box will already tell you that. Don't worry I won't remove it again, a bit tired of pointless edit wars, it stays your way.

Attentively --84.90.219.128 (talk) 04:33, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Turns out you are right about WP:OVERLINKING, though it's a guideline that seems to be rarely put into practice. As for your point about "free agent" not being needed because it's in the infobox, the problem is that if you apply your logic, we'd be removing a lot more information from the lede that's redundant with the infobox - name, date of birth, clubs he's played for, etc. That the lede duplicates a lot of the information isn't a problem - the point of the introduction is to summarize the content in the article body, and the infobox just gives an overview of the player's career. They serve different, albeit overlapping, purposes. Mosmof (talk) 05:32, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

February 2015
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=645748533 your edit] to Liverpool F.C. may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:42, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Total titles won (1871–present)]] have won more European trophies than any other English team with five European Cups, three UEFA Cups and

Disambiguation link notification for February 7
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Miami MLS stadium, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Miami River. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

February 2015
This is despite me clearly putting in a credible independent source that contradicts him? Kingjeff (talk) 05:10, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
 * You read the message and understand how WP:3RR works, yes? And your source and the IP's source aren't necessarily contradictory. Mosmof (talk) 05:26, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Of course I do. But I don't consider his source a credible source. Kingjeff (talk) 05:27, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Then you have a disagreement that's not going to be solved by edit-warring. Mosmof (talk) 05:29, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
 * That was actually going to be my next post on the ip's talk page. Since, you're online, do you mind if you look at this AfD? Kingjeff (talk) 05:30, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
 * I've made an edit which uses both sources - Bild (or at least people translating from German) calls it "demotion", HSV says "he's getting extra match action". The truth is likely somewhere in the middle.
 * As for the AfD, yeah, I think it's a clear delete, though it looks like whoever edited tried their best. Mosmof (talk) 05:45, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Stoudemire
Stoudemire has been officially waived, so everything is changed in the article – just like every other case. We don't have to wait until he "clears waivers". Once the team announces it, thats it. He is no longer with the Knicks. DaHuzyBru (talk) 02:15, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Mike Wallace
I made the changes to the Mike Wallace page because someone vandalized it. An unregistered user changed a bunch of stats along with his 40 yd dash time. The career stats that I put in were accurate according to NFL.com, Yahoo, ESPN, etc. I'm going to undo your changes because his career stats are no longer correct. Nuttster99 (talk) 01:25, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Okay, I couldn't tell that you reverted all of the IP editor's vandalism so I went back to the last version by an established editor. Sorry if that was in error. Mosmof (talk) 02:00, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Minnesota United FC (MLS) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Minnesota United FC (MLS) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Minnesota United FC (MLS) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Walter Görlitz (talk) 14:15, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Jonas Jensen
Is it OK to create a article about for example Jonas Jensen goalkeeper at Esbjerg fB? Ha has played several matches in the danish 1st division, and is currently playing for at team in the danish superliga, but hasn't played any matches in the superliga? Fodbold-fan (talk) 21:51, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Hypocrisy
I was just going to warn User talk:208.81.212.222 and User talk:Mikemor92 about the edit warring that they've engaged in. I see that you warned the anon but not Mikemor92. At best, it's quite bias of you. At worst, shows a complete lack of integrity. Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:36, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Whoa, easy there. As far as I could tell, only the IP editor reached 3RR, and Mikemor was still at 2. If I counted wrong, then you can feel free to tag the other user as well. Though it would behoove you to tone down your rhetoric a notch. Mosmof (talk) 04:58, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Ronn Torossian
The topic has been discussed on the talk page and a consensus has been reached. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cada mori (talk • contribs) 15:35, 23 April 2015 (UTC)


 * I got the user page message. I will modify it.TorossianRonn (talk) 01:49, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your response! Mosmof (talk) 02:03, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Broad Channel
I was being "unnecessarily hostile"? Yeah right. The 168th Street image is quite shaded in parts. The Broad Channel and the Far Rockaway image are more clearer and neat. I don't know what the hell you're talking about. Think before you speak. JoesphBarbaro (talk) 21:57, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Pity you. JoesphBarbaro (talk) 23:42, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Another random member who doesn't even edit any of the New York City Subway articles, nor knows nothing about the New York City Subway itself. Yeah, thanks for your "unnecessarily hostile" comment at that sockpuppet's page. Sit down and watch how I myself edit. JoesphBarbaro (talk) 09:15, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Why are you bugging me repeatedly over a single comment? Just chill and leave me alone. Mosmof (talk) 10:55, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
 * You're pathetic. JoesphBarbaro (talk) 15:19, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
 * This is my final request - please stay away from my talk page and hounding me through edit summaries. Thanks Mosmof (talk) 15:06, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

here is your source
Skippypeanuts (talk) 23:43, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

My fault for the block evasion, editing warring, personal attacks and harrassment
Look, I apologizes for all of my previous outbursts towards you and everyone else in general. I should have never been so incredibly aggressive and rude. I should have just solved things peacefully in the staff thread as well. I personally think that a New York City Subway image should show both front and side of each train line for the New York City Subway service articles, as I agreed with another remember of Wikipedia. Once my User:JoesphBarbaro account is unblocked, I promise to be civil and helpful and finally, stop edit warring and just simply take disputes to a talk page or the staff from now on. I also think the quality of the aforementioned images needs to be clear-looking quality too in addition. I'll talk more about that with the staff. Anyway, I'll return to honoring the terms of my block and I also promise I won't ever fight back again. I also just wanted to remove all of my outbursts so I myself don't look bad. That's why I wanted my previous conversation to be deleted in your talk page as well as the IP's talkpage in general, so that way, I don't look bad. It's fine if you don't forgive me though. I promise to change my behavior and treat everyone equally as a whole. 68.194.61.51 (talk) 23:15, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

Also note that this is my only IP address, as well as JB being my only account. I'm not going out of my way to abuse any multiple IP addresses and accounts. I've already undid the changes in the aforementioned New York City Subway articles. I promise. I'll now return to honoring the terms of my block. 68.194.61.51 (talk) 23:15, 18 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the message - I know it's easy to take things personally and get our emotions get the best of us (I've done it myself), and it's not easy to come out and say you were wrong, so I appreciate this. We're both here for the same reason, to improve articles, so no hard feelings. Cheers. Mosmof (talk) 23:24, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

Hello.
Hello bud, look at this ..


 * List of most expensive association football transfers
 * World football transfer record
 * Transfer (association football)

they are all wrong by listing Bale most expensive player over Ronaldo..your link seems more updated so we need to change them I think.

I already suggested to move two of these articles to one article and we can work on it if you want.

User talk:GiantSnowman

thank you.
 * Thanks - this might actually be a better discussion on WT:FOOTY. I can start a discussion there if you're not getting traction on those articles. Mosmof (talk) 18:00, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Did you get my email?
I sent it a few days ago, but you never acked. If not, I will send it again. --Ravpapa (talk) 11:23, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
 * I didn't. Let me check my settings to see if my email is correct. Mosmof (talk) 14:00, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Okay, try now. Mosmof (talk) 14:13, 30 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Take a look now.--Ravpapa (talk) 14:36, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

Hi
can you please tell us your opinion about this topic : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Football#Thomas_Vermaelen.27s_page_question_please_:

I see you active in sport pages so thought you might have an opinion about this. thank you Adnan (talk) 14:15, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Thank you + invitation
Hmlarson (talk) 01:12, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Cada mori
Our boy seems to have disappeared. Perhaps this is the time to restore the deleted section to the RT article? --Ravpapa (talk) 05:54, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Hobestly, I don't know where we stood in the discussion, but I think it was still contested. Maybe reopen the discussion? Mosmof (talk) 10:59, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Go for it/ --Ravpapa (talk) 17:31, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:New Minnesota Stadium logo.png
 Thanks for uploading File:New Minnesota Stadium logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:27, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Johncooper.jpg
Thanks for the housekeeping at this file; it was late at night when I noticed the previous version was a blatant copyvio of press photography at Cooper's trial and so I didn't use my commonsense and mark it for speedy then upload to a different file name. Sorry for creating extra work for you, but at least we will still get to the desired outcome of removing the non-free image. Keri (talk) 10:08, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
 * @ No worries - the image happened to come up on my watchlist. Mosmof (talk) 13:35, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

July 2015
Your recent editing history at Template:New York Knicks shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Corkythe  hornetfan  07:10, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
 * The user is engaged in clear vandalism (replacing "Linsanity" with the hoax "Fieldsanity") with a misleading edit summary - 3RR doesn't apply in cases of obvious vandalism, does it (I could be wrong about this, obviously)? And it appears that the user is a sockpuppet of blocked user (see edits, , ). Mosmof (talk) 07:14, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Sorry about this, you can remove it. You're right, per WP:NOT3RR (socks) and #4 (vandalism). I just noticed an edit war going and I was tired of seeing it. If they are a sock, I hope they get blocked, or at least for disrupting Wikipedia. This edit summary is a bit concerning, wouldn't you say? It shows they just go blocked, too. Corkythe   hornetfan  07:25, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
 * No prob, thanks for the response. I probably should've just started a sock investigation. I'll put up a request anyway, since the block is only temporary. Mosmof (talk) 07:27, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

clearly doesnt meet criteria for deletion
the article Steve Gatena substantially differs from that which was previously deleted.--JumpLike23 (talk) 01:39, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
 * You're right (I think), though the issues from the last deletions are still there, i.e. dependence on non-independent and self-published sources (the Forbes "contributors" are not subject to Forbes' editorial process). Mosmof (talk) 01:45, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

Florida Gators women's soccer players
Hey, MOSMOF. I saw that you were chewing on the Kat Williamson article, and then noticed that she was a University of Florida alumna -- and that she was mis-categorized under the generic parent category, Category:University of Florida alumni, and not the sport-specific subcategory, Category:Florida Gators women's soccer players. I'm not a huge association football/soccer fan, but I am a University of Florida alumnus and I do try to improve, maintain and protect all of the articles for former Florida Gators athletes regardless of what sport they played. If you come across any other mis-categorized Gators soccer players, I would be grateful if you bring them to my attention. Cheers. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 18:13, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I realized seeing your edits I didn't do a thorough job of going through the article. Thanks for catching that (and other issues). Mosmof (talk) 18:17, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

Hello mosmof
Hello mosmof!

Hope you are doing fine. I am asking you if i can make changes to leo messi's article. I am a great fan of him and believe have alot of valuable information that I can add!

Feel free to contact me here or through my email : koko10_77@hotmail.com. Thanks, Markeeeto (talk) 07:24, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Alex Morgan
Why do you keep erroneously editing Alex Morgan's Wikipedia page? The statistics for NWSL are clearly available on their website, and Morgan has neither played in 48 games nor scored 30 something goals. Get your facts straight. Nd2323 (talk) 20:44, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Not sure what you mean by "keep", since as far as I can tell, I've only edited her stats once (and sorry about the error). The page does attract a lot of vandalism, so when I see an empty edit summary with an edit that seems off (and a mobile edit to boot), I kinda assumed it was more of the same. Not an excuse, but that's my explanation. Anyway, thanks for pointing that out. Mosmof (talk) 18:11, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Your edits
The stadium capacity is NOT original research. Just because I moved the citation to after the sentence I added, the reference worked for the whole paragraph. Also, the Miami Herald does require a subscription once you've visited so many pages per month. I believe it varies in November I viewed many, now in December I'm already being hit with the paywall, though you can still scroll and see the article behind it. B137 (talk) 03:32, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

I see you switched it to a cite news, this would override the subscription, but did you first check to make sure this was in the print edition? B137 (talk) 03:35, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Actually, the point made in the article in the capacity isn't that there's a gap in what the two parties are looking for, but that they're both looking at a lower capacity than Sun Life Stadium. Check it out:
 * Miami is therefore looking for a venue that can hold 40,000 to 44,000 fans, according to the Herald, while the MLS and Beckham's group prefer one that seats approximately 25,000 patrons.
 * So to turn that into However, UM's target size of 40,000 to 44,000 seats is much too large for the MLS proposal. is very much your interpretation of the information that's not apparent in the source. Plus. it's really beside the point because the proposal never got beyond the discussion phase (assuming it was anything more than a ploy to get more leverage from lawmakers), so that statement I think gives WP:UNDUE weight to a plan that never came to materializing. So I'm going to go ahead and take the text out again - feel free to discuss in the article talk page if you want to discuss further. Thanks. Mosmof (talk) 16:22, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

A kitten for you!
Thanks for fixing the infobox on the page for Mark Dougherty! And a question for you: is it possible to cite to a physical object, like a trophy/ plaque/ ring/ jersey? SweetJane930 (talk) 20:10, 5 January 2016 (UTC) 
 * Hey, sorry for the slow response. I'm not sure what you mean exactly, but generally, I wouldn't use a physical artifact as a source. What you want is a published book or newspaper magazine (you can see WP:RS for more). I think citing a source would be considered original research and discouraged. Hope that helps. Mosmof (talk) 01:06, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

PUF discussion
Hi Mosmof. I pinged you in a WP:PUF discussion Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2016 February 9 since the file being discussed is one that you previously tagged with di-no source no license. Any comments you might have would be most appreciated. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:01, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Kansas University (logo).gif listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Kansas University (logo).gif, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 20:57, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

Christian Pulisic
I changed the image for Christian Pulisic, and now it is a different photo uploaded from Flickr, and it is from the Creative Commons. Spike 789 Talk 21:38, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Hi, thanks for changing the image. Unfortunately, I see that the license is "All Rights Reserved", not Creative Commons, and cannot be used on Wikipedia. And non-free pictures of living people are generally not allowed on Wikipedia either. Mosmof (talk) 23:59, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Neckface Begins.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Neckface Begins.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:42, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:PFT commenter with Flacco sign.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:PFT commenter with Flacco sign.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:22, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

Request for comments regarding Cristiano Ronaldo article
Hello, I noticed in the past you have commented on this, so I thought I would bring it to your attention. There is an ongoing dispute regarding the sentence 'regarded by many as the greatest of all time' on the Ronaldo page. There are three users who are defending this claim, and all are refusing to openly address any criticisms from a growing number of objectors. The matter is open for comments at the moment, so perhaps you would like to contribute? Thanks. O&#39;Flannery (talk) 15:21, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Mercedes-Benz Stadium interior bowl rendering.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Mercedes-Benz Stadium interior bowl rendering.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Ytoyoda (talk) 17:04, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:New Atlanta Stadium MLS configuration.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:New Atlanta Stadium MLS configuration.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the file description page and add the text   below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing   with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
 * 2) On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ytoyoda (talk) 19:45, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Washington Redskins script R logo.gif


The file File:Washington Redskins script R logo.gif has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unused logo with no article used, it's also can't move to commons because of an unused logo will be deleted as of out of project scope."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Willy1018 (talk) 05:07, 29 December 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:John Profumo 1960.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:John Profumo 1960.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:46, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Sunkist logo 2008.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Sunkist logo 2008.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:32, 15 June 2021 (UTC)