User talk:Mossback

Edit warring
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Czech Air Force. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. - FOX 52 (talk) 18:12, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
 * Hello, FOX 52. What about to discuss our dispute there? In my opinion, your reverts could be also viewed as edit war, but that is not relevant. What is relevant is that you should not delete an appropriate source. An annual Czech Air Force Yearbook is obviously somewhat more accurate or at least comparable source to Flightglobal’s World Air Forces 20XX. In fact, I have created a certain number of articles about various air forces on Czech Wikipedia and in most cases I have used Flightglobal as the main source for lists of aircraft. However, I would always prefer some specialised source (like Journal of the Air Force XY or XY Air Force Yearbook) if I had such source available. To conclude, the best solution from my point of view is to preserve both sources in the Czech Air Force article. I'm looking forward to your reply.--Mossback (talk) 21:11, 29 October 2016 (UTC)