User talk:Mostcareful

Welcome!

Hello, Mostcareful, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! - Sitush (talk) 00:42, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

January 2012
Your recent editing history at Boyar (caste) shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block.

If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly. Sitush (talk) 00:41, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

Boyar (caste)
Please will you desist from reinstating what appears to be an old, biassed, badly written and unsourced version of the Boyar (caste) article. You are welcome to amend the existing content but you must abide by the policies and guidelines here. I have left you a "welcome" note that contains some useful links to those policies/guildeines, and it would be great if you could spend some time reading them.

Also, if you make that edit once more in the next few hours then you will be blocked from contributing. It is as simple as that. - Sitush (talk) 00:46, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

Mr Sitush, Thank you for making me understand the fruitlessness of appealing to your benevolence, in desisting the urge to prune content uploaded, unless you have "actual" proof of factual errors. Based on your  judgement (as the authority on the "Boyar Community"), you have repeatedly removed content that is not merely "badly written (per your linguistic bias)", but is an important part of the identity of the Boyar community which strived hard to find its place in a society of prejudice.Folklore about ancestors and traditions passed for many generations (such as the Gotras)become part of the history of a community even though there is no proof "written" or "carved in stone". The sacred Vedas were passed down the generations in "Shruti"(verbal) tradition too.(Their origins and authors contested to this day). Wikipedia is a limitless ocean of information(and will hopefully remain so),where a descriminating reader can choose to pick his own pearls or pebbles.Following your sustained editing of the "Boyar Caste" would it now be safe to assume that all content that has not been edited by you, is current,unbiased,well-written and from well-respected sources?.I accept defeat and extend warm and well-deserved congratulations to you for succeeding in removing my privilages of participating interactively on Wikipedia hereon.(Three strikes and I am out!!!)I look forward to reading your edits on all other communities as well, (non-interactively of course!) Sincerely, Most Careful.


 * Hi, there is absolutely no problem with you contributing here provided that you comply with our policies etc. You are most welcome. However, among those policies are the requirements regarding reliable sources. We do not exist to promote or denigrate anyone or anything but we do insist that our content is verifiable. - Sitush (talk) 06:36, 28 January 2012 (UTC)