User talk:Mostdes88

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on. Again, welcome! JCutter (talk) 02:17, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion of KBot
A tag has been placed on KBot, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. JCutter (talk) 02:17, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

KBot
A tag has been placed on KBot, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of KBot and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. auto / decltype (talk) 02:17, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

May 2009
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself. Please use the template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's. JCutter (talk) 02:53, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

Conflicts
I noticed your note on KBot that the developer of the app would be providing more information. Before making those changes, can I suggest that you (or they) should closely read WP:COI and WP:SPAM. Regards. JCutter (talk) 02:55, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

RE:Conflicts
JCutter, thanks for the reply. I will gladly read those articles, in fact I already have started to. I apologise for not having done so before. I'm not, however, satisfied with the way it was so quickly dismissed before even being consulted with. KBot is an open source, freeware application so there's no financial gain on our part. It was merely created as another medium for Kosaki to document the creation of KBot. I wrote what I wrote so he had a basic layout to work from. I look forward to hearing from you. - Mostdes88 (talk) 03:29, 11 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Sorry to hear that you are not satisifed. Perhaps you missed the part above where I said "please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they  userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you." - so so your work is not lost.   However, please note that being freeware / opensource does not change anything with regard to SPAM and COI.  Non-Profit organzations and charities are subject to the same rules.  Regards.  JCutter (talk) 03:36, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

notability and secondary sources
I have reverted Kbot to a redirect. If this had of been a new article it would have been speedily deleted as your previous contribution under KBot had. While a helpful editor had removed much of the promotional content, there is no indication that the product has sufficient notablity for an article. This requires providing multiple reliable secondary sources discussing the product in a non-trivial manner. I could find no such sources. 66.57.4.17 (talk) 22:20, 7 June 2009 (UTC)