User talk:Mostergr

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -- SmthManly  / ManlyTalk  / ManlyContribs  18:51, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Neutrality of Skåneland
You commented: It seems to me that this article is written from a "Skåneland regionalist separatist" bias; given that such views are held only by a very small minority of people of Scanian origin (I am an expatriate member of the latter), this article can hardly be deemed neutral, and can perhaps even be misleading for people unacquainted with the subject matter. (added on 09:58, 17 April 2006 by User:Mostergr)


 * Welcome to Wikipedia.
 * As a general rule, we'd appreciate if you'd sign your comments. It's easy&mdash;just add four ~ in a row and save&mdash;it automatically signs your name.
 * The article may show a "Skåneland regionalist separatist" bias. But I found that the section which reads, “Official status &mdash; The term is not used in official contexts and is seldom used by Swedes, though being more popular within the region itself and with many regionalists and in the context of advocating Skåneland as an independent republic.” is rather clear to most of us non-Swedes. The history makes the context for the disagreement clear.
 * To achieve a "neutral" point of view, articles don't have to be (shouldn't be) neutered by removing all controversy; neutrality can be acheived by counterpoint. Since you are an expatriate of the area, I suggest it would be very constructive if you could develop a few counterpoint comments so that we might provide a point of view you judge represents both sides of the controversy accurately. If you're not comfortable putting new text in the main article, add it here and we'll help you refine it.
 * Cheers - Williamborg 03:28, 27 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Would be interested in your reacton to the revision of Skåneland. Williamborg 05:13, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:45, 23 November 2015 (UTC)