User talk:MostynMom

June 2019
Hello, I'm Meters. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Wild Karnataka have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Not a minor edit (see WP:MINOR), IMDB is not a reliable source and we don't use external links that way, and don't change the English variant from British to American on an Indian article.  Meters (talk) 04:17, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing. Additionally, If you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for your contributions to Wikipedia, you must disclose who is paying you to edit.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block. To do so, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the text at the bottom of your talk page, replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason for thinking that the block was an error, and publish the page. 331dot (talk) 10:00, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

Someone else will review it, but I have merged your requests. 331dot (talk) 21:33, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

331dot Thanks for merging the requests. Is there somewhere that shows the preferred method of addressing multiple items (individually or separately)? MostynMktg (talk) 21:36, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
 * If you mean requesting a new name and requesting unblock at the same time, it only needs to be done with one request(as above). Currently, the renaming system is not working, so that may take some time to address(hopefully not long), but someone else will review your request. 331dot (talk) 21:41, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

globally renamed MostynMktg to MostynMom
globally renamed MostynMktg to MostynMom Dlohcierekim (talk) 21:48, 21 June 2019 (UTC)


 * The user has not stated that they will comply with WP:PAID, or even that that have read it. The original account was named for Mostyn Marketing, a company that does digital marketing. See https://www.mostynmarketing.com/ They were blocked not just based on their username, and this  certainly looks like possible WP:UPE given the original name. Meters (talk) 01:21, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Indeed. I would not be in favor of unblocking unless this user complies with WP:PAID and WP:COI, agrees to not edit about current or future clients, and tells what they will edit about. 331dot (talk) 01:46, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
 * I missed it the first time, but the "I was unfamiliar with the topic that I was given to update" removes any lingering doubts for me. Meters (talk) 01:54, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
 * I have no interest in unblocking.Dlohcierekim (talk) 04:07, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
 * If I were interested in unblocking, 331dot's conditions are congruent with what mine would be. User:Dlohcierekim/decline promo renamed sums it up.Dlohcierekim (talk) 04:09, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
 * The original user name in my mind conjures images of a whole nest of UPE's swarming across the 'pedia adding ARTSPAM. Sorry if I'm being brusque; I'm very tired.Dlohcierekim (talk) 04:13, 22 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Would you voluntarily agree to refrain from editing or suggesting edits related to your clients, your competitors or any topic related to online marketing for six months? If so, I am willing to unblock you. Sasquatch t&#0124;c 10:08, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

Yes Sasquatch, I voluntarily agree to refrain from editing or suggesting edits related to my clients, my competitors or any topic related to online marketing for six months. Thanks!MostynMom (talk) 22:38, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Please do not forget to put up your disclosure statement on User:MostynMom. Cheers. Sasquatch t&#0124;c 23:40, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Almost two weeks since the unblock, and still no disclosure statement posted on the user's page. This is likely paid editing. Meters (talk) 23:16, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia is not the easiest editing system to learn and I'm nervous that I'm going to make another mistake. I believe I have correctly added the disclosure statement my user page and the Connected Contributor information to the page that I edited. Please let me know if there are changes that need to be made. MostynMom (talk) 01:37, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Everything looks good to me now. the diff you linked was before the block. I think you're on the right track, MostynMom. Sasquatch  t&#0124;c 05:09, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
 * I'm well aware it was before the block. The unblock was contingent on the user identifying herself as a paid user and identifying any paid edits. Almost two weeks after the unblock the user had still not posted a paid user notice on her page or on the talk page of what appeared to be a very likely paid edit by her. She's done so now, but It should have been done immediately, particularly after you made a point of reminding her to do so. Meters (talk) 05:17, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Unless you think for some reason that paid edits made before a user is identified as a paid editor don't need to be identified, I don't understand your point. Meters (talk) 05:20, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
 * I mean, the user also didn't edit for two weeks... I was confused as to why you brought up the diff when MostynMom admitted to paid editing. It's not like that needed to be established in any way. Anyways, as far as I can tell, everything looks good now. :-) Sasquatch t&#0124;c 05:27, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
 * I brought it up because the apparent paid edit was still in the article but was not flagged, as it should have been. I could have tagged it, but the user had not stated that that edit was a paid edit. The admitted paid editing was with respect to being assigned editing to Wild Karnataka, and that material had already been removed for other reasons. There was nothing on this page saying that there had been paid editing on AlixPartners, and, more importantly, there was nothing on that page.  I think it's reasonable to expect that a paid editor who has been unblocked should to go back and tag their previous paid edits. Most editors looking at that page would have no  idea that that material had been added by a paid editor. She's done the right thing now, but I'm still surprised that you seem to think it was unnecessary. Meters (talk) 05:47, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

 * Hi MostynMom! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission.  I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
 * The Teahouse new editor help space
 * Wikipedia Help pages

-- 20:30, Monday, June 24, 2019 (UTC)