User talk:Motamedd

The page you wrote on Noreen Motamedd has been proposed for deletion, though not by me; what is necessary is 3rd party sources, such as published  reviews.DGG 15:19, 10 March 2007 (UTC)


 * please refer to the voice of america interview with Noreen Motamed for notability of the artist verification Motamedd (talk) 14:20, 20 June 2023 (UTC)

Fereydoun
Do NOT include which libraries have them. ''and, most important, giving some 3rd party sources. They should be in English if possible but they do not have to be.
 * The page you have edited  on 'him  will probably be proposed or deletion sooner or later, though not be me, because it does not look like a WP article. He   seems a worthy subject for an article, but if you would like the article to remain you must write it in the WP style, which includes: *saying in the first sentence something to demonstrate notability, like "A.b. is an internationally-known professor of X at, winner of the XYZ prize and 10  honorary doctorates", or A.B. is a notable authority on Whatever. She is ... (etc) (whatever applies best). Use the exact wording I recommend, including either the word "notable" or "internationally-known" or "nationally-known"; do not use "famous" -- May sound silly, but that is what many people look for here.
 * not going into disproportionate personal details
 * listing college degrees with university and year -- and putting the university names in double brackets
 * listing important awards Put them in a list using * before each one, not in paragraphs.
 * listing important memberships and offices held
 * listing books published as formal references style: Author, title, Publisher, year ISBN if possible. -- in a list

These is, very  unfortunately, some prejudice against people from the academic world. There is also understandable feeling here against articles written by the subject or a member of his family, so it has to be a really solid article. See WP:AUTO and WP:COI

If you do not do this right away, the article will probably be deleted in a week or two--though not by me.

If you need assistance in finding book reviews etc., try any good library and ask--saying why you want them. I apologize for not having the time to help  personally. -- —The preceding unsigned comment was added by DGG (talk • contribs) 15:28, 10 March 2007 (UTC).

Possibly unfree File:Noreen Motamed Self Portrait-1991.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Noreen Motamed Self Portrait-1991.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Peripitus (Talk) 03:10, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:La Metrique Diatemporelle-Full Book-Ss.pdf
Thanks for uploading File:La Metrique Diatemporelle-Full Book-Ss.pdf. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 08:01, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

Category:Abstract Figurative
Category:Abstract Figurative, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. -- Another Believer ( Talk ) 15:58, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

COI edits Noreen Motamed & Fereydoon Motamed?
Hello, Motamedd. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Jooojay (talk) 08:01, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)