User talk:MothHoles

Welcome
 <div style="background-color: Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place  on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~) ; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started.  Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 18:47, 2 August 2022 (UTC)   Hello, MothHoles, and Welcome to Wikipedia!
 * 1) 084080;font:bold 120%/1.6 sans-serif;border:1px solid
 * 2) CEF2E0;color:
 * 3) FFC000;padding:0.2em 0.4em;">Getting started
 * Introduction
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
 * 1) 084080;font:bold 120%/1.6 sans-serif;border:1px solid
 * 2) CEF2E0;color:
 * 3) FFC000;padding:0.2em 0.4em;">Finding your way around
 * Table of contents
 * Directories and indexes
 * Department directory
 * 1) 084080;font:bold 120%/1.6 sans-serif;border:1px solid
 * 2) CEF2E0;color:
 * 3) FFC000;padding:0.2em 0.4em;">Editing articles
 * How to develop an article
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * 1) 084080;font:bold 120%/1.6 sans-serif;border:1px solid
 * 2) CEF2E0;color:
 * 3) FFC000;padding:0.2em 0.4em;">Getting help
 * Frequently asked questions
 * Cheatsheet
 * Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse
 * The Help Desk, for more advanced questions
 * Help pages
 * Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
 * 1) 084080;font:bold 120%/1.6 sans-serif;border:1px solid
 * 2) CEF2E0;color:
 * 3) FFC000;padding:0.2em 0.4em;">How you can help
 * Community Portal
 * Join a WikiProject
 * Follow Wikipedia etiquette
 * Practice civility
 * Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

It is disappointing and bizarre that within 18 seconds my article was declined without reading it.
 * All new articles on Wikipedia have to show the subject is notable (See WP:N) which in most cases requires significant coverage (WP:SIGCOV) in multiple independent (WP:INDY) reliable sources (WP:RS). There is no reason to more than scan the article as the sources are all primary, promotional or unreliable. KylieTastic (talk) 19:01, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

This article has been created as Wikipedia article (William Hampson) also an author, who died in 1926 is causing great confusion with the present 'William Hampson' and his works. Search engines are referring to the present day William Hampson (this article) and his published book, to the Author who holds a wiki article and whom died in 1926. Therefore, there is sufficient requirement for an article for the present day William Hampson so that the hundreds of articles online can link, through search engines to the correct author whom wishes to be known and or credited for his work. The present day William Hampson, works is currently on sale in Waterstones, Barnes and Noble and other major retailers worldwide. It is not unjustified he be linked with the correct article and not an individual of the same name who died in 1926.


 * Wikipedia is an Encyclopedia for notable topics and does not care about other subject SEO concerns or that they wish "to be known and or credited". I doubt someone would find William Hampson a non author born 1852 and confuse them with an author born 1982. Also for the way you write suggest you have a undisclosed Conflict of interest so read that before continuing and WP:DISCLOSE if required. If sources exist to show this author is notable by Wikipedia policies then William Hampson could be turned into a disambiguation page that links to William Hampson (author) and William Hampson (engineer). KylieTastic (talk) 19:01, 2 August 2022 (UTC)


 * That is some serious attitude, from behind your keyboard. There is no conflict of interest as I represent Mr Hampson (present day). We have been inundated from one social media account (276k followers) with these search engine results that show this article, including a photograph of a grey haired, bearded man [William Hampson]. We have been inundated with private social media messages including from two venues who are holding signings this month. A national charity who are in the process of marketing his book with the aim of generating charitable revenue. Therefore your 'opinions' are of no interest and are completely unfounded when my inbox is already raising concern over Mr Hampson's reputation. Mr Hampson has expressed to me he does not care much for Wikipedia as he finds it an unrecognised source and is often the source of ridicule within todays society. However, this poses a serious concern and one of commercial interest that has the ability to impact sales when his book is searched and a grey haired old man appears in an image that is clearly of a specific era and not the present day.
 * I will delve a little further to raise this with wiki direct, although we have tagged wiki in all the postings on social media and have been very clear how this fails to serve either legacy. The only decent suggestion from your rather surly response was adding 'engineer' to Mr Hampson.s page as him being catagoried as 'Author' on the search engine results has the engineer being identified as the author of the present day work. MothHoles (talk) 19:13, 2 August 2022 (UTC)


 * How else do people converse here apart from on a keyboard... just like you are? If you "represent Mr Hampson (present day)" then by Wikipedias polices then you do have a Conflict of interest and must disclose. If google is showing a confusing Knowledge Panel that is an issue you should bring up with google (as others have done) not here - Wikipedia has no control on what google does - sorry but I have no link for where you would go for that. Also the Wikipedia article for William Hampson does not mention and is not categorised author go again that is a google issue not a Wikipedia one. KylieTastic (talk) 19:22, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: William Hampson (Author) (August 2)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ingenuity was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:William Hampson (Author) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:William_Hampson_(Author) Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ingenuity&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:William_Hampson_(Author) reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

>>> Ingenuity . talk ; 18:24, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: William Hampson (Author) (August 2)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:William Hampson (Author) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:William_Hampson_(Author) Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:KylieTastic&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:William_Hampson_(Author) reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 18:47, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. KylieTastic (talk) 19:07, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

August 2022
Please stop attacking other editors. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. stwalkerster (talk) 19:25, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:William Hampson (Author)


A tag has been placed on Draft:William Hampson (Author), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. PRAXIDICAE🌈 19:44, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

August 2022
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action. You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. GeneralNotability (talk) 19:46, 2 August 2022 (UTC)