User talk:MotherNamma

February 2021
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Enki, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. This is not the first time you've added the material and been reverted, but no one has left you a warning as yet - I am now doing so. Wikignome Wintergreen talk 18:42, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

How is it not sourced? This paper shows that Enki was associated with these constellations. The astronomical record shows that the comet passes through each of those constellations in the way described. MotherNamma (talk) 19:05, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
 * If the paper states that Enki was associated with those constellations, and the paper is a reliable source by Wikipedia's definition, then all you can add to the article is that Enki was associated with those constellations. You cannot add any conclusions which are not explicitly stated in the paper. That's how Wikipedia works, and why all your additions are being reverted. Also, you should discuss additions to an article on the talk page if you find that they're contested - don't start edit warring to re-add them. Wikignome Wintergreen talk 19:23, 26 February 2021 (UTC)