User talk:Motnah

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (May 17)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Motnah/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Motnah/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:Motnah/sandbox Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:DoubleGrazing&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:Motnah/sandbox reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:58, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

Ways to improve Robert F. Fuchs (Orchidist)
Hello, Motnah,

Thank you for creating Robert F. Fuchs (Orchidist).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

"Subject appears notable but far too heavy reliance on connected sources. Need more independent sources. NYT mentions a book that may be a useful source"

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with. Remember to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Slywriter (talk) 17:10, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Teoh Eng Soon (July 24)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Missvain were:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Teoh Eng Soon and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Teoh_Eng_Soon Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Missvain&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Teoh_Eng_Soon reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Missvain (talk) 18:07, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Teoh Eng Soon
Hello, Motnah. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Teoh Eng Soon, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:01, 24 December 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Teoh Eng Soon


Hello, Motnah. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Teoh Eng Soon".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 18:27, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

November 2023
Hello Motnah. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Motnah. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. MrOllie (talk) 22:07, 15 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Hello MrOllie, thank you for your comments and thoughts.  Sorry if I gave the impression of financial stake in a topic.  This is not the case.  I am not being directly or indirectly compensated for my edits.  My edits here where the result of research I was doing about a topic and came across some notable people who have received important and notable awards.  Thank you for helping with my learning here and any additional advice would be appreciated. What do you suggest I do to correct the edits? Thanks in advance for advice.
 * Best Wishes
 * Motnah Motnah (talk) 19:54, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
 * On Wikipedia, a 'notable award' is one which has its own dedicated article. Something like the Fields medal. The awards you have been adding are not that. To correct your edits, I suggest you simply stop adding such awards - such trivia is off mission for an encyclopedia article. MrOllie (talk) 20:13, 17 November 2023 (UTC)