User talk:Motorhead

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Samw 00:31, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Reading spark plugs for racing
I hope you're not discouraged by your experience on Wikipedia so far and will choose to stay with us. In think the problem with Reading spark plugs for racing is that the technical depth of your contributions far exceed the current knowledge in Wikipedia and people don't know what to make of the contributions. I happily write obsure equations in trajectory, horsepower or siphon and no one objects because it's a logical growth of existing material. Perhaps we can work together to rewrite and move parts of your material to spark plug. With enough existing background in that article, we can then logically grow it into an expert article on racing. Feel free to email me at samwsamw at gmail.com Samw 14:29, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)


 * I've continued the discussion at Talk:Reading spark plugs for racing Samw 02:38, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Images
You seem to be uploading many very similar images. Did you know that you can upload a new image on top of an old one (by giving them the same name) if they are just simple modifications of each other? Also please put an image copyright tag on all of your images to indicate that they may be legally used (or else they may eventually be deleted). Thanks. BrokenSegue 20:48, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * P.S. if their are any images you don't plan on using put on it to have it deleted. BrokenSegue 20:51, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * I deleted all of the images you tagged. Remeber to add that copyright tag to all images you upload or else they will eventually be deleted. If you made it you can relese it as a public documents by typing or release it under GNU FDL by typing  . Thanks! BrokenSegue 21:38, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)

!jpg 25 time 1-4 decrease 5comp.gif

The copyright tags on your images
Two images that you uploaded, Image:!!jpg reduced 25pc no comp no decrease.gif and Image:!jpg 25 time 1-4 decrease 5comp.gif are tagged with both fairuse and GFDL. Under copyright law, these two copyright permissions conflict with each other. Please choose one or the other. Thanks. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 02:17, 24 May 2005 (UTC)

Reading spark plugs for racing
It unfortunately got deleted. Can you please vote at Votes_for_undeletion Samw 03:14, 23 July 2005 (UTC)

It's now up for a second vote at Votes for deletion/Reading spark plugs for racing/2. Please vote. Thanks. Samw

Image:Action hemi omni.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:Action hemi omni.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Zsinj Talk 23:52, 15 February 2006 (UTC) Technically, you do not have this image on your user page. This is a duplicate of the image you currently have. Also, this duplicate is not linked to anything. Hence, this duplicate can be deleted without any collateral damage. -- Zsinj Talk 01:14, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
 * The image on your user page is Image:Action_hemi_omni_pd.jpg. I hope this clears up any misunderstanding. -- Zsinj Talk 01:16, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
 * There really is nothing to worry about. You'll still have your picture, so you won't be able to see any changes. We are just taking an accidental copy of that picture and deleting it to save space on our servers. Hope this clears it up and happy editing! -- Zsinj Talk 01:31, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Cardinal reynard.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Cardinal reynard.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use GFDL-self to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Shyam ( T / C ) 16:55, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Port modification2.GIF
Thanks for uploading Image:Port modification2.GIF. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rory096 20:35, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Reading spark plugs for racing
I've nominated Reading spark plugs for racing, an article you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that Reading spark plugs for racing satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion; I have explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Reading spark plugs for racing and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Reading spark plugs for racing during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.-- SonicAD (talk) 02:59, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Lysholm screw rotors.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Lysholm screw rotors.jpg. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 00:11, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

Velocity stack
I came across the term 'velocity stack' with regards to the engine intake components and tried to find some information on them online but came away empty handed. Do you know anything about them? Feel up to the task of writing an article about them? Regards, --Hooperbloob 13:00, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Velocity_stack

There ya go!--=Motorhead 22:45, 17 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Awesome, thanks for the contribution! --Hooperbloob 22:55, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

Image:Action Pro stock team.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Action Pro stock team.jpg, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in its not being deleted. Thank you. -- Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 21:26, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Yea, I finally find a drag racing fan here in Wikipedia! Would you please add some basic description to this image which you are using on your user page ? The image was copied to Wikimedia Commons so all of the Wikimedia projects can use it (French, German, etc. Wikipedias). Especially important is the year (if know), class (I'm guessing it's a Pro Stock), and state that you took it yourself. I love the images on your user page! Royal broil  14:08, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

that picture is of albain gauthier s prostock hemi omni team i was working for at that time. it was at columbus ohio spring nationals the year we took runner up. probably about 84? anyway my brotherinlaw took it and i scanned it to create this pic. anyhow it seems to be deleted now.

Image:Action hemi omni pd.jpg
Hi. When you uploaded Image:Action hemi omni pd.jpg, you did not specify source and copyright information. Another user subsequently tagged it with GFDL-presumed and for some time, it has existed on Wikipedia under the assumption that you created the image, and that, just as with all of your text contributions, you contributed it under the GFDL. This assumption, however well-meaning, is not legally sufficient and the tag is being phased out. Images using it are being deleted.

This image has been tagged for deletion and will be deleted in one week if adequate copyright information is not provided.

If you, personally, are the author of this content, meaning that you took the photograph yourself or you created the chart yourself (and it does not use any clipart that you did not create), please retag the image with GFDL-self or PD-self. Please also make sure if you have not already done so that you write a good description of what the image depicts, when you took the photo, and other important details. This will allow Wikipedia to continue using the image.

If you did not create the image or if it is derived from the copyrighted works of others, please keep in mind that most images on the internet are copyrighted and are not suitable for use on Wikipedia. Wikipedia respects the copyrights of others and does not use images unless we know that they have been freely licensed. Any creative work is automatically copyrighted, even if it lacks a copyright notice. Unless the copyright holder has specifically disclaimed their rights to the image and released it under the GFDL or another compatible license, we cannot use it. If you did not create the image, simply do nothing and it will be deleted in a week.

Please feel free to contact me on my talk page if I can be of assistance or leave a message at Media copyright questions with any questions you may have. Thank you. --BigDT 13:22, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:Plug construction.jpg
Hi, Motorhead. Am I correct in assuming that you are the author of this image? If so, please mention it on the image's description page. The image has been uploaded to another Wikipedia and credits you as the author, so I just want to double-check. Anrie (talk) 14:08, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

More articles
Hello, I found your entry on cylinder head porting really good. It is accessible and technical at the same time. I've noticed from reading this page that you had done something about reading spark plugs but it got deleted. Is there any place where I can still access it? Have you written other articles (on wikipedia or elsewhere) related to motorsport? I'd be interested to read them.

Thanks, -Ben (I don't have a wikipedia account but I guess you can reply here.) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.252.89.154 (talk) 21:24, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

Appreciate the interest thanks. I just checked and the spark plug thing still kind of exists on wikibooks although its been modified.

http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Automobile_Repair/Spark_plugs

I wrote the article on airflow benches. Expansion chambers. I also wrote a thing on velocity stacks and leak down testers and contributed to superchargers and others, I forget. I think you can see all I wrote in "members contributions", A link associated with the ID page I think. I can also strongly recommend you read anything by Kevin Cameron who writes a regular column in CYCLE WORLD magazine. He is the best technical writer I have ever come across. Ive met him on several occasions and he is the real deal. In fact I would like to emulate his style if I could!--=Motorhead (talk) 02:47, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for the pointers, your contributions are here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Motorhead You must not be the only one to think highly of Kevin Cameron, they've made a book of his articles: "Top Dead Center: The Best of Kevin Cameron from Cycle World". I'll order it in time. -Ben —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.252.85.132 (talk) 21:25, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Yes I have "Top Dead Center" at my bedside table along with the latest edition of "Sportbike Performance Handbook" by Kevin Cameron. I Strongly recommend that one too. More techinical, direct and as excellent. I was once a member of AAMRR (American association of motorcycle road racers) Kevin was the tech director of the club so we had many opportunities to pick his brain or hang around for odd tidbits of technical gold to fall from the table, which we eagerly wolfed down.--=Motorhead (talk) 23:25, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Plug_reading.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Plug_reading.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:03, 7 April 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:03, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Expansion chamberB.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Expansion chamberB.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 10:38, 6 September 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:38, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

copyright
I dont know what else needs to be done. I have stated that I created these images for the articles in each case. what else is needed?

File:Flow bench schematic.JPG listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Flow bench schematic.JPG, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sir Armbrust Talk to me  Contribs  21:59, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

Notification of automated file description generation
Your upload of File:Cardinal reynard pd.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:53, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

Whitworth, Maudslay and the surface plate
Sorry, but I've reverted this as unsourced. Whitworth didn't work for Maudslay until 1815-1820 sometime (he was born in 1803) and it's implausible that he invented the surface plate making process that early. Rolt gives Maudslay as already using plates made by this process much earlier. Do you have a better source? Rolt is a great and very readable book, but I know he's not infallible. Andy Dingley (talk) 22:55, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

Minutes of Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, Volume 91- "In 1825 he married Fanny, youngest daughter of Mr. Richard Ankers,

and shortly afterwards came to London, to the workshop of Messrs.

Maudslay. He soon won a position as one of the best workmen, and

while here he made his first great discovery, which consisted in

the mode of construction of a set of perfect plane surfaces. Up to

that time the most accurate planes had been obtained by first

planing and then grinding the surfaces. They were never true, and

young Whitworth became possessed with the idea of making a true

plane. At the next bench sat a Yorkshireman named John Hampson, a

good workman and a good fellow, who took an interest in his young

companion’s work. One day as they worked Whitworth ventured on an

idea. 'If these planes were true, one of them ought to lift the

other.' 'Tha knows nowt about it,' was the cynical reply of

steady-going experience. Whitworth kept on at his problem, working

quietly at his lodgings. His first step was to abandon grinding

for scraping. 'Taking two surfaces,' he said, when telling the

story afterwards, 'as accurate as the planing tool could make

them, I coated one of them with colouring matter and then rubbed

the other over it. Had the two surfaces been true, the colouring

matter would have spread itself uniformly over the upper one. It

never did so, but appeared in spots and patches. These marked the

eminences, which I removed with a scraping tool until the two

surfaces gradually became more coincident'

But while his skill as a workman was thus being made the most of,

Whitworth‘s mind was not idle. He saw that his first thought was

not enough. Two surfaces might lift each other by fitting

perfectly and yet not be true planes. One might be convex and the

other concave. A new light came. Make three surfaces. If each will

lift either of the others they must be planes and must be true.

After another stage of skilful labour the three planes were made

and the test fulfilled. The Sunday after the problem was solved

Whitworth called on his old mate. 'John,' said the young man,

'come to my house ; I’ve something to show you.' The true planes

were exhibited. 'Ay! tha’s done it,' said John. That was probably

the greatest moment in a great life. Joseph Whitworth had

perceived that a true plane was the first thing needed for the

improvement of mechanical construction. He set to work to produce

it, and by sheer clear thinking and honest work he did produce it. "

........................................................ and: A remarkable advance in the direction to which we have

referred was made prior to the year 1840 by Sir Joseph Whit-

worth, and formed the subject-matter of a paper read before the

meeting of the British Association at Glasgow in that year.

Specimens of truly plane metallic surfaces were then, for the

first time, brought under the notice of scientific men, and the

method of preparing such surfaces was also made known. Up to that

time the process relied upon for obtaining plane surfaces on

metal plates, and indeed the only one practically used, had

involved the operation of grinding two plates together with emery

powder and water.-The Whitworth Measuring Machine 1877

The Whitworth Measuring Machine: Including Descriptions of the Surface plate.

............................................... There are many other references as there are many references that are hazy on the origins of the surface plate, wrongly attributing it to Maudslay such as Naysmiths book. However they confuse the lapping ABC (grinding as it was referred to at the time) method Maudslay used with the SCRAPING ABC method invented by Whitworth. Maudslay immediately adopted the new scraping process for his whole shop, leading some to wrongly attribute it to Maudslay but it was Whitworth who was the inventor.&#61;Motorhead (talk) 17:58, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:01, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Drag bike.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Drag bike.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:17, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

Architectural steel listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Architectural steel. Since you had some involvement with the Architectural steel redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 18:29, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Flow bench schematic.jpg


The file File:Flow bench schematic.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Orphaned graph/chart/diagram."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob 13 Talk 18:02, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Velocity profile.JPG


The file File:Velocity profile.JPG has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Orfice plate.JPG


The file File:Orfice plate.JPG has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Parts of the port.jpg


The file File:Parts of the port.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:
 * File:Velocity stack.GIF

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Valve flow coefficient .JPG


The file File:Valve flow coefficient .JPG has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Port modification.JPG


The file File:Port modification.JPG has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

File:Test pressure graph.JPG listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Test pressure graph.JPG, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Hog Farm Bacon 04:41, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

August 2020
Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:Killing of George Floyd are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines, not for general discussion about the topic or unrelated topics, or statements based on your thoughts or feelings. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. —Bagumba (talk) 05:41, 13 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Port modification.JPG listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Port modification.JPG, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ✗ plicit  01:25, 30 April 2022 (UTC)