User talk:Motorhead12

Your recent edits
Please do not add guideline in inappropriate places. I just removed it from two different locations that you added it to. Continuing to do so will result in a block for disruption. Thanks, Keeper   |   76   |   Disclaimer  21:23, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Re : vandal
vandals can be spotted very easily by using the javascript tool Twinkle or using the old school way. The old school way consits of going to the history page and use the compare section button. One of the most common ways to indentifie vandals is by checking if the current vesion has any bad words like F*U**K or capitlised wordsAlexnia (talk) 10:50, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

New page
Hi. I'm Chubbennaitor I can help you with anything you want. I see you have been put under concerning of sockpuppeteering get out of it as fast as you can because I hate it when that happens I don't like it. I have welcomed many an amount of people and 1/2 have been blocked. Your page I thought already existed. Bring up the page on the talk page and see where it goes from there. ' Chubb ' enna  itor  07:30, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

There is a Newsletter for you at WPF1. I 'run' it sort of. We also need editors. ' Chubb ' enna  itor  08:20, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

June 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. ''All historic edits can be viewed, even if you edit out the actual attack. Doctoring of your user page to remove warnings and other templates doesn't help.'' TheChrisD Rants • Edits 10:16, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. TheChrisD Rants • Edits 14:39, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

Sockpuppet
I know but the way you act and your name and reasons are suspicious. Motofan was a good friend and good man but if you are Motofan I'm sorry but it is an important WP rule that I understand. ' Chubb ' enna  itor  14:56, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

Short block
in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below. This is unacceptable from anybody, and coming on top of concerns regarding this account is really not a good idea. You have been blocked for 24 hours, and I suggest a clear change of tack in your future interactions.

I would also comment that, for a new account, you have very quickly grasped the meaning and implications of the term "sockpuppet". This, of course, is perfectly possible, but it is another example of how "misunderstandings" can arise when others have legitimate concerns. Nobody wants to deter a good contributor, but then nobody wants a disruptive account to resume their poor behaviour - and your attitude can go a long way to making sure the right decision is made. LessHeard vanU (talk) 15:09, 22 June 2008 (UTC)


 * I'm a bit baffled, here. What productive purpose do you believe is served by tagging yourself as a sockpuppet of numerous other editors? – Luna Santin  (talk) 09:01, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Sorry
I apologise for personal attacks to TheChrisD and I only got carried away after being accused of sockpuppetry. I also apologise for any inconvenience that I may have caused. I know Flyhead personally but I am not a sockpuppet of him.Motorhead12 (talk) 11:30, 23 June 2008 (UTC)