User talk:Motorizer

Just a small note
There is no need to "update" maintenance templates, as you did [ here] and [ here]. Rather, they shouldn't be updated (if the same problem applies), as dating the maintenance tags sorts them under subcategories of Category:Articles lacking sources (or whatever problem was tagged) to allow the oldest problems to be gradually worked through and fixed first. I've put the original November 2008 dates back in a few places you changed them. • Anakin (talk) 00:46, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

Ku Klux Klan
Hi, I noticed you added "Christian fundamentalist" to the KKK article, but the sentence you added it to was cited to an offline source. Does that source mention Christian extremism? If not, there should be another source cited. Everard Proudfoot (talk) 05:01, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

Martin Luther King, Jr.
I'm trying to help. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 02:40, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

BLP issue
Hi Motorizer, I've just removed an unsourced paragraph from Freaks, Faggots, Drunks and Junkies due to a WP:BLP concern. I appreciate this was some time ago, but if you still have access to a reliable source for that info feel free to restore and cite it, however I'm afraid that sort of claim needs very good sourcing. Cheers.  Ϣere Spiel  Chequers  16:55, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

December 2010
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Stormfront (website), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Jayjg (talk) 05:26, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

June 2011
Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits, such as your recent edits to American Third Position Party, as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes, or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Jrtayloriv (talk) 05:58, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

Categorization edits
I have some concerns about your recent edits. You appear to be removing "anti-Communist" categories from American presidents and adding "anti-Communist" categories to Nazi generals. That might be fine, but not with misleading edit summaries like "Category alphabetization". Could you explain why you are doing this? 28bytes (talk) 07:03, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:DocDart.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:DocDart.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is [ a list of your uploads]. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Acather96 (talk) 10:12, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

File source problem with File:DocDart.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:DocDart.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Acather96 (talk) 07:30, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

Use of minor edit flag
Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes, or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. --John (talk) 06:26, 19 August 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited The Pogues, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Irish and Celtic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:49, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

Removal of cited innformation
You recently removed a claim from the punk rock article that cited a source. Normally, editors should not remove sourced material without at least mentioning a reason on the talk page to see if the removal will be uncontroversial. I reverted your edit. Thanks. —Mark Dominus (talk) 15:03, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

In fact I now see that someone else reverted your edit even before I did. —Mark Dominus (talk) 15:04, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited How I Got Over (album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rock (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

Edit summaries
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to Strasserism does not have an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! Andy Dingley (talk) 09:50, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 6
Hi. When you recently edited Helen Keller, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Radical left (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:26, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

April 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Neo soul, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 22:39, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)