User talk:Moulmouin

Hello, Moulmouin, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who use multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 12:42, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Irrelevant pictures
Please stop adding irrelevant pictures to the Shiva Bhagwati Temple Akingam article - one or two pictures of the temple would be fine, but pictures of nearby hills and pastures are not wanted - Thanks - Arjayay (talk) 16:04, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Shiva Bhagwati Temple Akingam. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 16:07, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Maintenance templates
Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Shiva Bhagwati Temple Akingam, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 16:05, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Badasgam


The article Badasgam has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * No claim of significance; no mention of subject in external sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Specto73 (talk) 13:19, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of U-Tech College Of Computer Education Akingam Kashmir
Hello, Moulmouin. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, U-Tech College Of Computer Education Akingam Kashmir, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:


 * 1) edit the page
 * 2) remove the text that looks like this:
 * 3) save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

 Onel 5969  TT me 01:18, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about U-Tech College Of Computer Education Akingam Kashmir
Hello, Moulmouin,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether U-Tech College Of Computer Education Akingam Kashmir should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/U-Tech College Of Computer Education Akingam Kashmir.

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

 Onel 5969  TT me 12:12, 28 April 2017 (UTC)