User talk:Mountaineer1976

Welcome!

Hello, Mountaineer1976, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Yasubey Enomoto, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! The-Pope (talk) 15:35, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Proposed deletion of Yasubey Enomoto


The article Yasubey Enomoto has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners or ask at Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. The-Pope (talk) 15:35, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Zak Cummings


A tag has been placed on Zak Cummings requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  at the top of the article, immediately below the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate), and providing your reasons for contesting on the article's talk page, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

You may want to read the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. -- Ice (talk) 05:29, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bobby Voelker


The article Bobby Voelker has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners or ask at Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. The-Pope (talk) 07:32, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Fight Festival


A tag has been placed on Fight Festival requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Terrillja talk  14:58, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

November 2010
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself. Please use the template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's talk page. Thank you. Terrillja talk  15:01, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

Hi Mountaineer
Hello Mountaineer. I've been informed of the latest developments involving you tonight. I'm here to provide some sort of answers if you have any questions, considering that I'm heavily involved in the MMA project here on wikipedia. I believe that an article of yours was speedily deleted today and that you recreated it. While your efforts to provide new articles are very much appreciated, the blanking of deletion templates is considered bad faith and can unfortunately lead to temporarily blocks of editing, should that behaviour carry on.

For what it is worth, I think you're doing a good job, as there are some people, like Bobby Voelker who warrant articles; but I'd like to just give you a couple of pointers with your creations.


 * At present, a few of your creations only have 1/2 line intros and nothing else. Ideally, we need to fill in some detail with sources for two reasons.
 * If we wanted to just see a fighter record, we'd go to sherdog's database. People would come to wikipedia to read about the fighter, which is why we should write about their past fights, background etc.
 * Secondly, anything that isn't sourced could be misconstrued as original research that isn't verifiable. As such, some articles can be deleted if they are missing sources.

I hope this hasn't been too long that you've lost interest; I just hope that you can co-operate with people instead of keeping silent on us. If you have any questions, just leave a reply below and I'll try to get back to you. I'm willing to help you out should you want that.  Paralympiakos  (talk) 23:51, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Shamar Bailey


A tag has been placed on Shamar Bailey requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Top Jim (talk) 14:04, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Fight Festival


A tag has been placed on Fight Festival requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Terrillja talk  07:45, 10 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Hi Mountaineer1976... I have added a response to the CSD tag at Talk:Fight Festival. I don't think this article should be deleted under CSD#A7, and I hope that what I have written is more than enough to ensure that any admin would decline such a request.  I'm disappointed to see you have been having a hard time here at wikipedia, and that you haven't been met with more friendliness.  Let me assure you that content contributions are welcomed and appreciated, so please don't get too discouraged.  I know that Paralympiakos is willing to give you some help if you need it, and you can also contract me if you like at my talk page.  Kind Regards, EdChem (talk) 16:23, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

Your addition to Fight Festival has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Terrillja talk  17:07, 13 November 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for your help, but I am almost finished that section.(Justinsane15 (talk) 06:24, 18 November 2010 (UTC))

Welcome!
Hi, and thanks for writing all of these MMA articles! They're looking pretty good so far. Like EdChem, I think if you flesh out the existing articles a little before starting new ones, you'll have less of a problem with them being proposed for deletion. Wikipedia is extra-strict about biographies of living people, and that is mainly what you're writing, so it's probably a good idea to play things on the safe side. I recommend starting by reading Citing sources, and Verifiability. If you stick to those two, you shouldn't have any more trouble. All the best! — GypsyJiver  ( drop me a line ) 01:41, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

Ultimate Glory 11: A Decade of Fights
A guy has named some of your pages up for deletion and he doesn't feel that he needs to say anything so I'm letting you know. Cheers. jsmith006 (talk) 20:25, 2 July 2011

Proposed deletion of Fight Festival 27


The article Fight Festival 27 has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable event stub with only one citation.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Phospheros (talk) 14:00, 10 September 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Fight Festival 28


The article Fight Festival 28 has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable event stub with only one citation.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Phospheros (talk) 14:01, 10 September 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Valdas Pocevičius for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Valdas Pocevičius is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Valdas Pocevičius until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. LlamaAl (talk) 03:29, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Petras Markevičius for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Petras Markevičius is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Petras Markevičius until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. LlamaAl (talk) 21:32, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Fight Festival


The article Fight Festival has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable MMA promotion.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. LlamaAl (talk) 21:34, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Ben Holscher for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ben Holscher is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ben Holscher until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. LlamaAl (talk) 21:35, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Derrick Noble for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Derrick Noble is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Derrick Noble until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. LlamaAl (talk) 21:36, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Po'ai Suganuma for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Po'ai Suganuma is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Po'ai Suganuma until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. LlamaAl (talk) 21:36, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Yoshiyuki Nakanishi for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yoshiyuki Nakanishi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Yoshiyuki Nakanishi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. LlamaAl (talk) 21:38, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Yancy Medeiros for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yancy Medeiros is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Yancy Medeiros until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. LlamaAl (talk) 21:38, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Nemesis Fighting: MMA Global Invasion for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nemesis Fighting: MMA Global Invasion is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nemesis Fighting: MMA Global Invasion & until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. LlamaAl (talk) 21:40, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Deep: 50th Impact for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Deep: 50th Impact is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deep: 50th Impact until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. LlamaAl (talk) 21:44, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:27, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:11, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Carlos Barreto (fighter), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mark Kerr. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

please create page
Please create page Masoud Minaei on of the best kickboxer https://www.instagram.com/tv/Cfb6T0-jhX9/?igshid=YmMyMTA2M2Y= 95.162.171.128 (talk) 04:27, 5 May 2023 (UTC)

please create this page
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?create=Create+new+article+draft&editintro=Template%3AAfC+draft+editintro&preload=Template%3AAfc+preload%2Fdraft&summary=--+Draft+creation+using+the+%5B%5BWP%3AArticle+wizard%5D%5D+--&title=Draft%3AMasoud_%22The_silent__Assassin%22_Minaei# 95.162.171.128 (talk) 05:00, 5 May 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 31
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2023 in Bellator MMA, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Saitama.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:42, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 25
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mike van Arsdale, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mark Robinson.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 25 June 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Yasubey Enomoto
Hello, Mountaineer1976. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Yasubey Enomoto, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:05, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)