User talk:Mountainfan5

How can I get ride of the issue on my page?
Your question. --Mountainfan5 (talk) 23:02, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Hi there, what page are you asking about? And what do you want to remove? --  Chzz  ►  23:06, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Is this about the notice at the top of Armormax that it needs sources for verification, reads like an advertisement and contains peacock language? If so, please visit the linked pages (the blue-colored words are links) in the notice, which take you to pages explaining the issue and how to remedy it. If after looking at that material you want some specific advice, please ask away.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 23:11, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the quick response. I need help getting rid of the ambox and peacock terms on the page "Armormax".
I guess I predicted right. See my message above.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 23:12, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for your help.

I've added third party references and other people have made contributions as well. Can I submit it to the community for revisions or how can I have someone fix it? I don't want it to be written like an advertisement. Sorry, I'm new to editing on wikipedia.


 * I've fixed your naked references to full citations, as all good articles must have, and made other formatting tweaks. Now what is needed is removal of all the corporate puffing ad-speak—promotional language that is the opposite of neutral point of view. That is what makes it sounds like an advertisement. The company "has become a world leader in the design and..." "Utilizing the latest..." "The company implements"—it's reads like a commercial and a very blatant one at that. Remove everything but the hard facts and it'll start down the right track. You wouldn't want me to edit it. I'd reduce it to three or four sentences.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 01:49, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

You're awesome! Thanks so much for your help. Let me know if you need anything.

May 2009
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. -- aktsu (t / c) 23:08, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

Conflict of interest
It appears from your edits that you may have a conflict of interest with some of the articles you have edited. Please read and follow the guidelines below:

If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you.


 * Thank you Smartse (talk) 01:04, 21 May 2009 (UTC)