User talk:Mournful

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Further note: I have undone your changes at Template:UK-academic-bio-stub. You unfortunately tried to create an article in a template, which is the wrong way to do it - that particular template is used on lots of articles to show that the information is about a UK academic and can be expanded. Your changes meant that, for a while, every article using the template was displaying your notes about Edith Hall! If you want to create an article about an academic, and you think that they are sufficiently notable (check the guidance at Notability (academics)) then go ahead - but on a new page, not in a template! Have a look at Help:Starting a new page for more information. Hope all this makes sense. Regards, BencherliteTalk 19:45, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Later note: having written the above, I see you've already created a page for Edith Hall. A good start, well done.  I've added some categories to the article.  However, I've left a note on the talk page about some of the phrases used, as you'll see, and it would be better still if you could provide specific references for some of the points made in the article.  Let me know if I can help or if you're unsure what to do or how to do it.  Regards, BencherliteTalk 20:02, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Edith_Hall.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Edith_Hall.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Darkwind (talk) 18:01, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Sockpuppet investigations/Boils24 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Crusio (talk) 20:11, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Sockpuppet investigations/Mournful for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Crusio (talk) 15:57, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

Block extended to 1 week
Due to your clear block evasion, I have extended your block to 1 week. You are advised that continued evasion of your block will lead to your block to become indefinite. Regards, –MuZemike 16:26, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Sockpuppet investigations/Mournful for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Crusio (talk) 10:53, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

Block extended
It's now a month for continued sockpuppeting. Once more and it'll be indefinite. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 16:47, 23 March 2011 (UTC)