User talk:Mouser Hyde

Speedy deletion nomination of Chris Rezanson


A tag has been placed on Chris Rezanson requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Singularity42 (talk) 01:06, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Chris Rezanson
If an admin does decide to delete the article, might I make a couple suggestions?
 * If you don't have enough in the article to indicate the subject's importance, but you will soon have that information to add to the article, you might want to create the article as a subpage to your userpage until it ready to be added as a proper article.

Singularity42 (talk) 03:40, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
 * If you plan on relying on your own interviews, make sure you are familiar with Wikipedia's original research policy and reliable sources policy.

Actually, that above comment answers your question pretty well. :) Myspace isn't considered to be a reliable sourceof info, but if the subject really has done work of this magnitude on major video games, adding some verifiable third-party references will result in the article's staying up.  I'll create a user subpage for you with your original text.  This will allow you to work on the article online but off of the main article space at your convenience and without the worry of deletion:

User:MouserHyde/Chris Rezanson

Just click on the above link when it turns blue and you'll be good to go. Good luck and please don't hesitate to ask for help. It's just that biographies of living persons require a lot of backing. Thanks for being nice, by the way. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 02:13, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

You got it, Mouser. :) I wish you luck with the new article and I'm glad that this misunderstanding didn't drive you off.  PMDrive1061 (talk) 02:30, 9 September 2009 (UTC)


 * I moved the page to User:Mouser Hyde/Chris Rezanson, which is your username. Tim Song (talk) 06:34, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Chris Rezanson


The article Chris Rezanson has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Doesn't pass WP:COMPOSER.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Clubmarx (talk) 22:44, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Crez.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Crez.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 04:20, 18 March 2011 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 04:20, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

File:Crez.jpg missing description details
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Crez.jpg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:53, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

More information needed about File:Rezanson.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Rezanson.jpg. However, it needs some more work before it is okay to use on Wikipedia.

Please click here and do the following:


 * 1) Add a description of where the image comes from (not what it is) and who the creator is. Please be specific, and include a link if you can.
 * 2) Find the appropriate license from the list of free, non-free media, or public domain options. Copy the license template and paste it in the file's page, and save.

If you follow these steps, your image can help enhance Wikipedia. If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the media copyright questions page.

Thank you for your contribution! --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 13:05, 6 January 2012 (UTC)