User talk:MouthlessBobcat

Welcome
Hi, MouthlessBobcat. Welcome to Wikipedia!

I hope you like it here and decide to stick around. If you see something on Wikipedia that you want to change, just press the edit button and change it!

For the basic principles, see the five pillars of Wikipedia. And if you're ready to make some edits, this Wikipedia cheatsheet may come in handy.

Cheers, ChzzBot IV (talk) 11:00, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation


I noticed your submission in Articles for creation, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Racism in the LGBT community. Thanks! It will be reviewed by a volunteer soon.

Before it can be added to Wikipedia, your submission should have references. All articles on Wikipedia should have inline, numbered references after facts, showing the 'reliable source' (a newspaper, book, etc.) where the information can be checked, so that all information is verifiable.

Here's an example of how to add references: Chzz is 98 years old.&lt;ref> "The book of Chzz", Aardvark Books, 2009. &lt;/ref>

He likes tea.&lt;ref> Smith, John. " Interview with Chzz", Foo News, 1 April 2010. Retrieved 2011-05-22.

== References ==

That makes the references automatically display as small numbers[1] which will link to the details in the section titled == References == at the end. You can see that example in action here.

Please add references to your submission, which will be reviewed as soon as possible. See also, Referencing for beginners. If you need any help, just put at the end of this page, followed by a question or get into our live help chat chanel at.

Best, ChzzBot IV (talk) 11:00, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. However, the reviewer felt that a few things need to be fixed before it is accepted. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text to the top of the article.)
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, you can use the edit button at the top of the article, near the search bar
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Help desk or the [ reviewer's talk page]. Alternatively you can ask a reviewer questions via live help
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Armbrust Talk to me about my editsreview  13:42, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Artel Walker


The article Artel Walker has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * As best I can tell from looking at the old deletion discussion, this is just a recreation of the article deleted by Articles for deletion/Artel Jarod Walker.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nat Gertler (talk) 15:27, 30 December 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Artel Walker for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Artel Walker is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Artel Walker until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Nat Gertler (talk) 08:23, 31 December 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jeffrey Williams (fashion designer)


A tag has been placed on Jeffrey Williams (fashion designer) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 09:52, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

January 2012
Your addition to Jeffrey Williams (fashion designer) has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. ''2nd deletion: Copy of http://www.bravotv.com/the-fashion-show-ultimate-collection/season-2/bio/jeffrey-williams. Please note that in  addition, biographies must  fully  comply  with WP:BLP. We do  not  accept blogs, social media sites, agency  sites, and personal  websites as proof of notability. '' Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 10:16, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as you did at Jeffrey Williams (fashion designer), you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 10:59, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Page creation blocked
Instead of blocking you  account, I  have prevented the page from  being  recreated again  in  mainspace. Please feel free to  develop  the article in  your sandbox. When it is ready, please ask  me to  review it  and I  will  move it  back  to  mainspace for you. Please note however, that as it  is a biography, it must  be correctly  and adequately  sourced, and it  must  be completely written in  your own words (not  even close paraphrasing). --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:08, 2 January 2012 (UTC)


 * I have reviewed your article on Jeffrey Williams (fashion designer). While it  may  just  scrape through  on  notability (that  will be a Wikipedia community  decision after it has been published ), it's still  a close paraphrasing  of the website. You  must  try  to  write this in  your own words because we have a very  sophisticated bot  that  automatically compares all  our articles with  everything  on  the web, and runs  the results through  a duplication detector.  --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 12:38, 2 January 2012 (UTC)


 * I have just denied the AfC for the same reason. There was still copy/paste phrases, nor even close paraphrasing. When the article will be good and not infringing any copyright it will be accepted. -- ★ Pikks ★  MsG  16:22, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. However, the content was removed because the submission was composed of copyrighted information, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, you can use the edit button at the top of the article, near the search bar
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Help desk or the [ reviewer's talk page]. Alternatively you can ask a reviewer questions via live help
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! ★ Pikks ★  MsG  16:18, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. However, the reviewer felt that a few things need to be fixed before it is accepted. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text to the top of the article.)
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, you can use the edit button at the top of the article, near the search bar
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Help desk or the [ reviewer's talk page]. Alternatively you can ask a reviewer questions via live help
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Kevin Rutherford (talk) 23:56, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. However, the reviewer felt that a few things need to be fixed before it is accepted. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text to the top of the article.)
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, you can use the edit button at the top of the article, near the search bar
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Help desk or the [ reviewer's talk page]. Alternatively you can ask a reviewer questions via live help
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Kevin Rutherford (talk) 04:27, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Langston Hughes
Hi Bobcat, I saw that you have submitted Langston Hughes for GA review. Having been involved in some of the GA process I have to say, I don't think LH is ready for this, for various reasons. There is not one major editor looking after or improving the page and hasn't been for many years. This means there's nobody involved who's ready and set to do all the work to bring it up to GA standard. Much of it has no citation, which is a must for a GA. There is no section about the themes and/or style of his work, critical appraisal and such, which is also needed. I appreciate it's a vote of confidence in the article, which is great, but I know that there is a long GA appraisal backlog and it's a pretty time consuming process for reviewers. (There's work waiting since January to be reviewed). Maybe have a look at poet's articles such as W. B. Yeats, Maya Angelou and Walt Whitman to get a sense of what's needed. Editors often submit articles for a peer review first, to get a general sense of where the article is at and what works needs doing, before applying for the whole GA/FA hog. So, I'd personally recommend withdrawing the application for GA and maybe work on some of the article points until the basics are in place. Thanks and best wishes Span (talk) 10:21, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Sorry Bobcat. As Span says the article is a long way from meeting the Good article criteria. I would suggest working on the suggestions given and then taking it to peer review. You could then renominate it at WP:GAN. AIR corn (talk) 11:14, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

May 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Flash mob, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Mkdw talk 22:13, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content or add categories, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Span (talk) 15:57, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

June 2012
Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to Love on Top, without providing a source and without establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. Oz  talk  23:32, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

Template:Big Brother US
I have removed the addition of unrelated content to the Big Brother template as noted above. Accordingly, I have also removed the Big Brother template from The Glass House (2012 TV series) and The Glass House (season 1) articles. I would recommend possibly creating a template for The Glass House series, rather than placing a template for a unrelated reality show that appears on a different network. If you have questions, please feel free to contact me. Best regards,  Cindy  ( talk to me ) 10:01, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

November 2012
We need to talk... — Preceding unsigned comment added by SecretAgentMan0079 (talk • contribs) 07:58, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Karen Dyer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Idlewild (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:34, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Francesca Hogi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Attorney (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Francesca Hogi


The article Francesca Hogi has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. ApprenticeFan work 13:50, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Big Brother 1 (Canada), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Salon, Support and Slice (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:04, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Magical Voice Shower


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Magical Voice Shower, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 14:08, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Dream Line Out


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Dream Line Out, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 14:09, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Louis Cole and Genevieve Artadi


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Louis Cole and Genevieve Artadi, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 14:10, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Gary Levy


A tag has been placed on Gary Levy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Technopat (talk) 11:15, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

Your revert at Francesca Hogi
Can you please explain your actions at the article for Francesca Hogi? You reverted my redirect against the consensus reached at a discussion on the talk page. -- Whpq (talk) 23:45, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

May 2013
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Francesca Hogi. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Whpq (talk) 10:18, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Hello, I'm Nathan Johnson. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Template:Survivor contestants that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia needs people like you and me to collaborate, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ''Your comment here stating "You guys redirected the page because you guys are racists" is unacceptable. Please assume good faith of your fellow contributors.'' Nathan Johnson (talk) 16:37, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Francesca Hogi, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Mr. Gerbear (talk) 09:46, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for making personal attacks. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. — Mr. Stradivarius  ♪ talk ♪ 10:16, 8 May 2013 (UTC)


 * In particular, this edit was an unacceptable personal attack. If you continue to make attacks like this, or if you continue edit warring, you may be blocked for longer the next time. — Mr. Stradivarius  ♪ talk ♪ 10:21, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Racism in the LGBT community concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Racism in the LGBT community, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 23:29, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Gary Levy for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gary Levy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Gary Levy until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Whpq (talk) 22:38, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:MouthlessBobcat/sandbox
User:MouthlessBobcat/sandbox, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:MouthlessBobcat/sandbox and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of User:MouthlessBobcat/sandbox during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 04:04, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Francesca Hogi concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Francesca Hogi, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:05, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Your article submission Racism in the LGBT community


Hello MouthlessBobcat. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Racism in the LGBT community.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 01:00, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Francesca Hogi concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Francesca Hogi, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Karen Dyer for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Karen Dyer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Karen Dyer until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Binksternet (talk) 16:31, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Francesca Hogi


A tag has been placed on Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Francesca Hogi, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It is a rejected submission at Articles for creation, and it has not been edited in over a year. (See section G13 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Binksternet (talk) 16:34, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:The Fashion Show (U.S.)
Template:The Fashion Show (U.S.) has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. -- wooden superman  11:11, 10 May 2023 (UTC)