User talk:Moviefreak11

Welcome!
Hello, Moviefreak11, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome!
 * Introduction to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

June 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=558501492 your edit] to Civil engineering may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].

Blocked
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Graham 87 02:19, 6 June 2013 (UTC)


 * I'm personally unable to find a reason why this is indefinite - although I can see a few major errors that led to a block of some duration. First, on two separate articles you replaced reliable sources (such as the Hindustan times) with non-reliable ones.  You also appear to have messed up an infobox for Cartier Railway.  These appear minor overall, but add up t a bit of WP:COMPETENCE issues.  Care to expand so that I can get a better idea and/or contact the blocking admin for further clarification? (✉→ BWilkins ←✎) 11:23, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
 * How about the account, which made similar edits? And why do you think the sites you added are reliable sources to begin with? They seem like spam to me. Graham 87 09:42, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Greetings, BWilkins & Graham. In reference to your above reply: Yes, could be my own account but it might have happened that I forgot the username or password for that. So, I created a new one movie freak 11. And I have not messed up with infobox for cartier railway. If you check the older version, the infobox was little messed up not showing properly the start and end date. So, I corrected it. Regarding replacing of articles of Hindustan Times, like I said above, the article might be relevant to the movie as whole, but the location of reference was not appropriate so I placed a appropriate reference for that location in the article. It was for Director or Producer of the movie. The reference should be precise allowing users to find what they want, not a ton of information to search into.}}
 * Duplicate request disabled Mdann52 (talk) 12:40, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
 * So basically, what you are saying is that is another of your accounts? In that case, we have a case of sockpuppetry then? Mdann52 (talk) 13:00, 13 June 2013 (UTC)