User talk:Moviefreak732

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Karm a  fist  04:13, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Gerard Tassin
The article Gerard Tassin has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. FreplySpang 17:49, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

ITS A COMPLETELY LEGITIMATE TOPIC! JERRY TOSS-AAN IS THE BEST RADIOLOGIST IN ALL OF SOUTHERN LOUISIANA!

January 5th
Could I suggest that editorial disagreements are most likely to resolve quickly and productively when editors observe the following: Thanks! --Brad Beattie (talk) 17:53, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Remain polite per WP:Civility.
 * Solicit feedback and ask questions.
 * Keep the discussion focused. Concentrate on a small set of related matters and resolve them to the satisfaction of all parties.
 * Focus on the subject rather than on the personalities of the editors.

Regarding edits made during January 7 2007 (UTC) to Jimmy Wales
Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. ¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 00:37, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

I'm trying to get your attention so you'll remove Gerard Tassin. Moron. Moviefreak732 00:38, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism is an inappropriate way to do so. Please refrain from trying it, thank you.¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 00:39, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Well then get on with it and delete the article. Consider this a proposal for deletion. Moviefreak732 00:41, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

You will have to wait for an administrator to do so.¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 00:47, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Penisfucker
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. (aeropagitica) 00:52, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

October 2007
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to God, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: God was changed by Moviefreak732 (c) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2007-10-13T06:24:57+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot 06:25, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:3x15screengrab.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:3x15screengrab.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 12:43, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:106lost-screen.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:106lost-screen.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:11, 27 October 2007 (UTC)