User talk:Mowsseep

Iridium
Your addition of irrelevant trivia was not important to the article. Ferocious Flying Ferrets 14:38, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

Irrelevant? Impossible. It is relevant. You deleting it was vandalism. Mowsseep (talk) 14:41, 9 May 2013 (UTC)


 * I would have to disagree. There's a reason your changes keep being undone. Please try to be a bit more respectful. Ferocious Flying Ferrets 14:43, 9 May 2013 (UTC)


 * You should be more respectful to positive edits. Mowsseep (talk) 14:44, 9 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Your edits were undone because they were unnecessary. How did your addition improve the article? Ferocious Flying Ferrets 14:46, 9 May 2013 (UTC)


 * It was an interesting fact that was deserving of being on an article, although I suppose the trivia is too good for Wikipedia. Mowsseep (talk) 14:47, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. ChemNerd (talk) 14:51, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Ed (Edgar181) 15:02, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Materialscientist (talk) 00:54, 10 May 2013 (UTC)