User talk:Moz1992

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello, Moz1992, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Reaper Eternal (talk) 21:00, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four halfwidth tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 21:16, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

Okay - however the information was clearly sourced - whilst most of the article is not sourced? I don't understand why you have deleted the section?Moz1992 (talk) 21:06, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
 * You need to be more specific, what page are you talking about? C T J F 8 3  21:43, 23 March 2011 (UTC)


 * He meant this and this. Thing is Moz1992, your edits seem to be aimed at one thing and one thing only: to insert that piece of information about those schools. Your account, to put it bluntly, seems to be a single purpose account with a conflict of interest. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is neutrality. Whether or not an information can be sourced, always be careful not to give undue weight to tangential information, especially to potentially damaging ones. Do not for example, state something as true unless the people involved have actually been convicted in a court of law. Even then state it neutrally. Use of certain adjectives, unnecessary focus, and using only 'one side of the argument', while remaining outwardly neutral, can still give information an inappropriate slant. When potentially damaging information is transient and does not promote further understanding of the actual subject of the article, they should not be included as well. When it involves living people who are named/identified, the rules are even stricter.


 * In short, really: Wikipedia can not be used for scandal-mongering. I hope that was clear enough. Thank you.--  Obsidi ♠ n Soul  23:26, 23 March 2011 (UTC)