User talk:Mozaikka

April 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Estrela Negra de Bissau, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Estrela Negra de Bissau was changed by Mozaikka (u) (t) blanking the page on 2008-04-20T07:46:42+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 07:46, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Estrela Negra de Bissau constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Abrech (talk) 07:48, 20 April 2008 (UTC))

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Campeonato Nacional da Guiné-Bissau. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Abrech (talk) 07:51, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Culturenga
An article that you have been involved in editing, Culturenga, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Culturenga. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice?

Please do not create hoaxes. Cease and desist from introducing misinformation into Wikipedia if you are attempting to test our ability to detect and remove it. This has been done before, with universally negative results. Hoaxes are marked for deletion shortly after they are created. Kindly — do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method is to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia, and then to check to see how long they have been in place and, if possible, correct them. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia policy to learn more about this project and how you can make a positive impact. Thanks, ~ Eóin (talk) 00:38, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Matavai


The article Matavai has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Possible fake football team as it is unreferenced. I see lots of redlinks as well.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The Snowager -is awake  02:17, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of RC Lomé


The article RC Lomé has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Suspected fake Togolese football team. I could not find any news mentioned, as seen of this URL;http://basketball.afrobasket.com/team/Togo/Racing_Club_Lome/5570?Page=8

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The Snowager -is awake  02:23, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Palmeiras Quelimane


The article Palmeiras Quelimane has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Just yet another fake football article, no references.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The Snowager -is awake  02:38, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Romos Maputo


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Romos Maputo, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. The Snowager -is awake  02:38, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Desportivo Tete


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Desportivo Tete, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. The Snowager -is awake  20:59, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

April 2015
This is your only warning; if you create an inappropriate page again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. The Snowager -is awake  21:03, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Cultural Beira


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Cultural Beira, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. BlueworldSpeccie (talk) 13:40, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Cultural Beira for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cultural Beira is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Cultural Beira until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TL<b style= "color:#FF7400">2</b><b style= "color:#FFA700">2</b> (<i style= "color:green">talk</i>) 21:50, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Desportivo Tete


The article Desportivo Tete has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * No indication of notability of this football team, doesn't meet WP:FOOTYN, article created by editor who created blatant hoaxes.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nfitz (talk) 01:15, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Estádio de Tete


The article Estádio de Tete has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * No indication of existence of this stadium, probable hoax, doesn't meet WP:FOOTYN, article created by editor who created blatant hoaxes.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nfitz (talk) 01:15, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Palmanga De Qelimane


The article Palmanga De Qelimane has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * No indication of existence of this stadium, probable hoax, doesn't meet WP:FOOTYN, article created by editor who created blatant hoaxes.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nfitz (talk) 01:15, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

2008 Creation and edits of African Football Teams and stadiums
Looking through your edit history (much of which has probably vanished, given the evidence that there has been significant mass deletions already - see Articles for deletion/Culturenga. The articles created on April 1, 2008 seem to be almost completely fictional - perhaps with random team names that do exist, but are not necessarily notable. The articles that remain for later in April are for teams that do exist, and are (perhaps coincidentally) are notable - but much of the material added was completely fictional (such as the lineup and the stadiums the team played in). Not surprisingly they were unreferenced. Over the years some of this material has been fixed/removed - but in some articles there seems to still remain come completely fictional information. Nfitz (talk) 01:15, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

Possible Sock Puppetry
The editing pattern of this user seems to be similar with User:Waidoer and User:Shtraker. Are there any relation between these users? Kudos to User:Calapez who tried to clean up some of this mess up in May 2008, despite the roadblocks that others were throwing in his way, who appeared to be concerned that articles about possibly real teams, were entirely fictional beyond the team name. Nfitz (talk) 01:15, 12 March 2017 (UTC)