User talk:MozartFan5

Welcome!
Hi MozartFan5! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 01:04, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

January 2022
Hello, I'm Melmann. I noticed that in this edit to West Berlin discotheque bombing, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mel ma nn  23:00, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

April 2022
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Mỹ Lai massacre. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Wikipedia is not the place to fix notional problems in society. Binksternet (talk) 18:31, 12 April 2022 (UTC)


 * This edit was not commentary, a point of view, or my own personal analysis but instead an application of Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and to make the sentence edited more logically and grammatically correct. A neutral point of view policy is neutral, meaning that it is unbiased and does not reflect the notional problems of society. I did not make the edit to fix notional problems of society but to apply the neutral point of view policy to correct the separation of men and women as separate categories which usually implies in society a different value of life between men and women indirectly when this distinction of adults according to their gender in unnecessary when Wikipedia should make no acknowledgement of implied cultural biases. A neutral point of view should therefore simply use the word "adults" rather than "men, women". It also makes logical sense as the same sentence refers to children and infants rather than distinguishing children according to their gender into boys and girls. Because of this it would be logical and grammatically correct to refer to the men and women killed in the My Lai massacre as adults rather than distinguishing them according to their gender. MozartFan5 (talk) 16:56, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Mỹ Lai massacre, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 16:54, 16 April 2022 (UTC)


 * I am not adding my own personal analysis even if you disregard my acknowledgement of the cultural notion of male disposability the sentence makes more logical and grammatical sense to refer to adults killed in the My Lai massacre as "adults" rather than "men, women" because the categories of "children" and "infants" makes no distinction according to their gender already. Children and infants in the sentence are not referred to as "girls and boys" so why should adults be referred to as "men and women"? MozartFan5 (talk) 17:00, 16 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Wikipedia is not the place to Right Great Wrongs. You must stop your campaign to correct common usage. Binksternet (talk) 17:01, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
 * That is a grammatical correction then as I have said earlier. I have read about righting great wrongs and because I am making a grammatical correction to maintain consistency throughout the sentence when referring to each noun there is no case of "righting great wrongs". This is at least the case when it comes to the MyLai massacre. I will stop any editing however that does not have to do with grammar and will abide by the no "right great wrongs" rule of Wikipedia. MozartFan5 (talk) 02:06, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

June 2022
Hello, I'm Sea Cow. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Sexism—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Sea Cow (talk) 02:16, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

Discretionary Sanction Notification
 Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 05:35, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

June 2022
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 05:05, 16 June 2022 (UTC)