User talk:Mozbrat

Dear little pony
Hello. The stub you created is worded like an advertisement and needs rewriting from a more neutral point of view. I'm sure it can have inclusion in Wikipedia, but it reads now like a pamphlet. I know I'm being really picky, but it just seemed like it could use work and the article in the new articles list didn't look any different from any of the articles that were created as blatant advertisement. Certain sentences especially gave this impression, such as "Some of the things that set Dear Little Pony apart from other online magazines is the willingness to allow DLP to be a community" and "You are welcomed to email comments, questions, or submissions to any of the creators". The article also lacks any indication of its importance and therefore should not be included in Wikipedia (at least in its current state). If you feel very strongly about this article's inclusion I suggest you rewrite it with a more neutral, encyclopedic feel, wikify it, and make a note of its concrete importance. Ben Tibbetts 01:36, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

EDIT: for the time being, I am also deleting the reference to Dear Little Pony in DLP. This can all of course be reverted. Ben Tibbetts 01:39, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

Tag was added for proposed deletion and concurred to with another wikipedian. It was then removed without explanation by "anonymous" IP address with that as its only contribution. Further perusal of article suggests pure advertisement for the magazine which, upon examining the included webpage, doesn't meet the standards of wikipedia's importance whatsoever. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag I have posted on the article unless you have a proper explanation of why this article should be in Wikipedia. Ben Tibbetts 00:58, 16 June 2006 (UTC)