User talk:Mpa4879

June 2019
Hello. I noticed that you recently removed a significant section of cited and otherwise valid content. The suggestion in your edit summary (that the content represented opinion and not fact) is not supported by the fact that there are multiple neutral and otherwise reliable sources supporting the statements in those various sections. If you feel otherwise, then please advise specifically which elements of the content represent uncited or unattributed "opinions" on the relevant talk page. Where other editors can contribute to a consensus discussion on whether there are specific issues to address. Otherwise, the wholescale blanking of cited and balanced content may be considered vandalism. And treated accordingly. Thanks. Guliolopez (talk) 18:13, 16 June 2019 (UTC)