User talk:Mpadma

 Hello Mpadma, and Welcome to Wikipedia!  Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

--- Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:


 * Table of contents


 * Department directory

Need help?


 * Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
 * Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
 * Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations
 * The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)


 * Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
 * The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
 * Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:


 * Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help


 * Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...


 * Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes ( ~ ). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The [[File:Button sig.png]] or [[File:Insert-signature.png]] button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.


 * If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.

Mpadma, good luck, and have fun. – Chander  For  You'''  15:19, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

Reply
Add this  on your uploaded picture. Ch an  de r  19:00, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Poonam Jha


A tag has been placed on Poonam Jha requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. AllyD (talk) 06:50, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

June 2016
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Poonam Jha, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. AllyD (talk) 07:18, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Budhdhu Bhutum


A tag has been placed on Budhdhu Bhutum, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. TheCrazedBeast (talk) 23:52, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Budhdhu Bhutum


A tag has been placed on Budhdhu Bhutum, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. TheCrazedBeast (talk) 01:02, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Buddhu Bhutum


A tag has been placed on Buddhu Bhutum, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. TheCrazedBeast (talk) 01:22, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

B Bhutum article creation.
Hello. Because you keep recreating a similar page that is repeatedly deleted I want to be sure you know the reasons.

This film has not yet been released. Therefore and article at this time is considered blatant advertising and it cannot meet WP:GNG or WP:NFILM. Also, Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. An article would be appropriate after the film is released and it can meet the notability guidelines for a film. I'll be happy to explain further but please do refrain from creating further articles on this subject. If you would like to dispute my actions please visit WP:ANI. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheCrazedBeast (talk • contribs) 01:36, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

Films which have NOT released are accepted by Wikipedia and here is one proof: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kaabil among MANY others in Hollywood too. The article has all references and authentic information, please raise this point to your Admins and editors - to remove be the warning for deletion! If you are unhappy with the English language used in the article, feel free to edit the grammar in encyclopedia format! Please review and do the needful!

Starlight 01:47, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Just because other similar articles might exist does not necessary mean that a particular article should also exist. However, while you are correct that a separate article for a film that has not yet been released may be accepted, they must meet certain strict criteria. You have not provided, and I am unable to locate, any source that this film meets the criteria here: WP:NFF. It has begun principle photography, but I can find nothing notable about the film or it's production. I do not believe that the film is notable per the guidelines here WP:GNG and here WP:NFILM. For this reason I choose not to remove the deletion request. If you disagree then please involve an administrator by visiting WP:ANI TheCrazedBeast (talk) 02:22, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Buddhu Bhutum for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Buddhu Bhutum is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Buddhu Bhutum until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheCrazedBeast (talk) 02:57, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

Thanks, let users find a few more credible sources and information. Please feel free to edit this article.

Proposed deletion of File:YashDasguptaPhoto.jpg


The file File:YashDasguptaPhoto.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Comes from a Tweet on Twitter, no evidence of being CC-BY-SA 4.0"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — MRD 20  14  02:19, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Sanjana Banerjee for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sanjana Banerjee is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Sanjana Banerjee until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Saqib (talk) 09:21, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Poonam Jha for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Poonam Jha is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Poonam Jha until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Saqib (talk) 09:27, 1 April 2018 (UTC)