User talk:Mpatel/archive 4

Quran Project
Can you add GlobalQuran.com link on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quran. it was there, but someone removed it and i cant add it again, the page is locked.

we have worked for very long time to build this application, it would be great to let people use it and learn Quran easily. email me if you have question (info@globalquran.com) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ibnbasit (talk • contribs) 22:10, 26 November 2011 (UTC)

BookwormUK
Thanks for the heads up. I'll be monitoring her closely now. If someone openly espouses bigoted opinions (e.g. that Islam is "the world's most hated religion" and Muslims are "brainwashed"), I don't think they have long for wikipedia anyway. Hopefully. Deuterium 11:08, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

Black Stone
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. BookwormUK 17:51, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

God vs Allah
Because of your previous activity with regard to your topic, I thought I'd let you know that there is a poll going on at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style (Islam-related articles)/God vs Allah. It'd be great if you could vote. Thanks! Starwarp2k2 04:09, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

I made the same U-Turn, hehe. Starwarp2k2 12:25, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

Hadith
Im just happy to see people joining the projects :) --Striver 10:58, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

Suhuf-i-Ibrahim article edit
Hi, MPatel/MathPhys. Can you please give reasons / what bases you use to justify not including the Latter Day Saints issue  |here? Moreover, do you want to continue this cabal case since there is nobody to take up the other side of the case? Jsw663 18:23, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for recategorising Maulana, Andhe ki laathi. I was struggling to think where it should go. Also, there is still some religious terminology that I didn't know so couldn't link to or explain in English. I was trying to help clear the wikification backlog and came up against my ignorance of Islam. Itsmejudith 22:23, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

Metre Poetry
Hi there, I wish I had seen your comment earlier. I also wanted to know the difference when I edited that part about the etymology of "Qur'an". I meant to say the meter in poetry. In Arabic it is called "wazn" and the literal translation of "wazn" is "weight".

For example in arabic you would say that "place" and "grace" have the same "wazn" because they have the same # of letters and also sound similar. Having known that, do you think it should be Meter(music) or meter(poetry) Thank you for your input.Marwan123 05:00, 28 October 2006 (UTC)


 * I also think it is Meter(poetry). All I wanted to prove by adding that part about the meter of the word "Quran" is to show that this word is actually derived from an Arabic root rather than being derived from a syriac origin. This is very clear to me as an Arabic speaker. Unfortunately some people, who are obviously not linguists, still think that the part about Quran being syriac in origin should remain. This theory is more than 100 years old and has almost no supporters among real linguists yet its taking half of the etymology section. Marwan123 20:41, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

The Eotvos effect
I copy and paste from User Talk:Cleonis :
 * [...] By the way, I didn't realise that there was an article on the Eötvös effect - thanks! MP  (talk) 12:18, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Just to be sure: are you referring to the Eötvös effect or the 'Eötvös experiment'? The article that I wrote about the Eötvös effect is unrelated to GTR, in the sense that the Eötvös effect is general physics, it applies equally in newtonian dynamics and GTR; no distinction. The Eötvös experiement of course tested the equivalence of inertial and gravitational mass.

What is interesting about the Eötvös effect is that it is closely related to the Coriolis effect as taken into account in meteorology. On my own website the Eötvös effect article is the opening article of an assembly of four articles. 1) the Eötvös effect 2) rotational-vibrational coupling 3) Inertial oscillations (the inertial oscillations that are taken into account in oceanography and meteorology) 4) Comparison of inertial oscillations and ballistics. --Cleonis | Talk 16:45, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

AfD
Hello. Could you please follow the procedure described at Articles for deletion when nominating a page for deletion? The article won't be deleted otherwise, unless a poor soul fixes it up, like I did for Indian relativity. Cheers, Jitse Niesen (talk) 02:08, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

Re: Indian relativity
M - Thank for the head's-up on that article. In response, I have put Aryabhata's relativity principle up for deletion also. The creator of that article has failed to make any case for me that the article should exist, and the resposne to the AfD of Indian relativity has given me hope that I get this one removed also. --EMS | Talk 15:31, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

CH
M -

Chris Hillman has been trying to contact you. I tried forwarding some e-mail from him to you. Have you received it? All that I can tell you is that Chris wants to talk to you. --EMS | Talk 06:18, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Types of hajj
Dear MP, the problem with the section that I deleted was that it was so terse, and presumed such an acquaintance with Arabic, the various madhabs, etc., that I found it impenetrable. If I found it hard going (and I'm somewhere more informed about Islam than the usual encyclopedia user, thought I'm certainly no scholar) I don't think a regular user could make head or tail of it. If you want to restore that information, you're going to have to unpack it. Similarly the hajj undertaken for others. That deserves a section, and perhaps some examples. If you just say that it exists, blam, then that info is going to float over readers' heads.

I recall several accounts of vicarious hajj in accounts of 18th and 19th century Indian life. The wealthy, aged, and feeble would do the hajj this way, as it was the only way that they could. But is it so common now? I should think that with jet travel, vicarious hajj would have disappeared. If there are any stats available on the numbers of such pilgrims each year, that would certainly help. Zora 06:12, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

AfD Islamic socialism
You have edited the article Islamic socialism. This article is currently being considered for deletion under the wp:afd process. You may contribute to this discussion by commenting here. Thank you. Edivorce 01:28, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Photons from special relativity?
You wrote that "In special relativity, it is possible derive E=hf by assuming that light has a certain frequency and energy (or momentum if you want to think in those terms). Once the four-momentum for light is defined (without necessarily referring to any de Broglie type of hypothesis), it is straightforward to deduce the above energy-frequency relation." But I don't see how special relativity gives you a relationship between the energy and frequency of light. In classical electromagnetism, the energy density of an electromagnetic field (light) depends on the amplitude and frequency. Nothing compels you to introduce photons with E=hf. (Let's continue the discussion on this page, please) Dark Formal 18:59, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Your edit to Freemasonry
I read the source again, and it uses the word "felony". However, if you can find me the original law, a translation thereof, and a classification of levels of crimes, I'd be happy to change it to something more accurate. Furthermore, it's "too American" simply because other countries call them "indictable offenses" (not "serious crimes"), and probably because the article is from an American paper. In any case, as per your "important issues" section of your user page, hopefully you found the article useful and informative. MSJapan 21:43, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

Contribs
Why isnt your contribs link enabled? Sup with that? --Matt57 (talk•contribs) 17:38, 24 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Hi there. Actually, it is enabled. I have no problems viewing my contributions. Try again later. MP  (talk) 22:31, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I dont see any link here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Mpatel -- you should remove this redirect to the MathPhys user. --Matt57 (talk•contribs) 23:16, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

This kind of redirect is aggravating and inappropriate.Proabivouac 06:29, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
 * It would be helpful and courteous if you said why you find it "aggravating and inappropriate". MP might change it and resolve whatever problem you're having with the redirect if you give some reasons. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 08:31, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
 * MPatel, thanks for removing the redirect. Can you also fix your signature so it goes to Mpatel instead of MathPhys? The reason is that when people click on your signature, they should arrive to the username you're using so they can see your contribs, your actual user page and talk page. This is the signature code you can use:
 * MP  (talk)
 * thanks, --Matt57 (talk•contribs) 12:37, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
 * No problems - done. MP (talk•contribs) 14:00, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks, works great now. --Matt57 (talk•contribs) 02:40, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

General Relativity (book)
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on General Relativity (book), by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because General Relativity (book) fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason: Notability not asserted. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting General Relativity (book), please affix the template  to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 18:20, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

Cat Islam
The Islam cat is reserved for top level articles only. --Matt57 (talk•contribs) 13:10, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
 * If you see Category:Islam, it says there that it must be pruned regularly. There's lots of Islamic stuff, so we cant put all the articles in that cat, only the most top level articles like Muhammad. --Matt57 (talk•contribs) 15:41, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
 * See here which mentions, the template that Category:Islam uses. --Matt57 (talk•contribs) 15:49, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Islam cat looks okay to me now. If you think there's a main top level article that should be added, go ahead. --Matt57 (talk•contribs) 15:50, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
 * you can also create new sub-categories if you think there can be any where some other articles can be grouped too. --Matt57 (talk•contribs) 15:51, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of categories:(Country) converts to Islam
A tag has been placed on, requesting that they be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a. If you can indicate how Category: (country) converts to Islam is different from the previously posted material, or if you can indicate why this article should not be deleted, I advise you to place the template hangon underneath the other template on the article, and also put a note on Talk:Category: (country) converts to Islam saying why this article should stay. An admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 4 under General criteria. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. We welcome your help in trying to improve Wikipedia, and we request you to follow these instructions. Sef rin gle Talk 03:12, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

Repost of Category:American converts to Islam
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:American converts to Islam, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:American converts to Islam was previously deleted as a result of an articles for deletion (or another XfD) To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:American converts to Islam, please affix the template  to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 13:54, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

Repost of Category:Austrian converts to Islam
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:Austrian converts to Islam, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:Austrian converts to Islam was previously deleted as a result of an articles for deletion (or another XfD) To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:Austrian converts to Islam, please affix the template  to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 14:00, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

Repost of Category:Beninese converts to Islam
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:Beninese converts to Islam, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:Beninese converts to Islam was previously deleted as a result of an articles for deletion (or another XfD) To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:Beninese converts to Islam, please affix the template  to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 14:00, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

Lesser Inner Greater Outer
You're a general relativity custodian at wikipedia, right? When you copyedit, rather than revert, vandalisms like this one, it's almost like a stamp of approval. Tsk tsk. -lethe talk [ +] 05:15, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

Do high G forces created by acceleration also slow time in the same manner as large planets?
Magruderb 15:14, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Relativity
You asked me to take part in this project. I believe, a lot of confusion comes from not properly described experiments and terms. But if I try to show, that a clock could be a counter to count the oscillations of electromagnetic wave, caught in an resonator exitated by emissions of the most simple atom, I am stopped with the allegation of OR. If such basic message is OR, I can't contribute anything. Talk:Twin_paradox The term rod has the following translations to german: rod            das (auch: der) Pleuel rod [tech.]	der Biegedorn rod [tech.]	die Bohrstange rod [tech.]	der Brennstab   [Kerntechnik] rod [tech.]	der Dosierstab rod	 	der Eisenstab rod	 	die Fuchtel rod [tech.]	das Gestänge rod [tech.]	der Greiferbalken rod [tech.]	die Kurbelstange rod [engin.]	der Linienträger rod	 	der Mast rod [tech.]	der Rundstab rod [tech.]	die Rundstange rod	 	die Rute rod [sl.]	das Schießeisen [sl.] rod	 	der Stab rod [engin.]	der Stab rod [anat.]	das Stäbchen rod [anat.]	die Stäbchenzelle  wiss.:Cellula optica bacilliformis	i rod [tech.]	die Stange rod [tech.]	die Steckachse rod [textil.]	der Stoßarm  - Ladtrieb rod [tech.]	die Strebe rod	 	die Zuchtrute

But some unknown prohibits me to show, that a rod stands for a well defined materialistic object of certain length, what most simple is a lattice of atoms, which gives us the possibility to link geometric dimension to wavelength of radiation on one hand and to define the distance of two mirrors, that form such a apparatus, working as said resonator. Therefore, I'm not, no longer and not again interested in such work. If I'm alone! ;-] ErNa (talk) 07:25, 14 January 2008 (UTC) No answer? ErNa (talk) 09:24, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Ununoctium FAC
I noticed you have taken a look at the article several days ago. You are welcome to leave some thoughts/comments on the article at the FA candidate page. Thanks! Nergaal (talk) 21:42, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Isometries in physics
I see you have a history of working on the article Isometries in physics. I am looking at it from the project Unreferenced articles where it is one of the longest unreferenced tagged articles that does not meet at least the barest minimum of verifiability. It has been tagged and completely without references since June 2006. It would be extremely helpful if you had some references you could add to the article to help support its verifiability and notability. Thanks for any help you can give.  Birgitte SB  21:23, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Please help us with Ali article
Hi, I saw you have done good efforts to improve Qur'an. Can you do similar work for Ali, which is nominated as a GA article. Thanks.-- Seyyed(t-c) 12:48, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your help. Do you want the tag remain on the article anymore.-- Seyyed(t-c) 02:44, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for your work

 * Shouldn't be too unexpected, I have Ali on my watchlist, so I've seen all your work on it, as well as your work on Qur'an. You've been doing necessary work and it's quite appreciated. Peter Deer (talk) 21:29, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
 * I think it's good idea to put a comment on this page under my request and declare you've done it.-- Seyyed(t-c) 03:18, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Isometries in physics
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Isometries in physics, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add  to the top of Isometries in physics. Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 22:21, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

Muhammad / The Prophet
Hi, I think in some cases which we want to emphasize on the religious aspect of Muhammad we can use "The Prophet". You see the meaning of the superiority of the Prophet's progeny over the rest of the ummah and the superiority of Muhammad's progeny over the rest of the ummah are completely different. Of course it's against WP:MOSISLAM but I put my idea there. Please write your idea here-- Seyyed(t-c) 11:39, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Distortion of Succession to Muhammad
When I separated Shia-Sunni views and leading paragraph I had a reason. In brief the first paragraph shows scholars viewpoints about the historic fact and the last one shows Muslim beliefs. For more explanation please read here. -- Seyyed(t-c) 11:55, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Please forgive me but I revert your edition in this section.-- Seyyed(t-c) 11:57, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
 * That section has completely two different part. I clarify them by adding a sub section.-- Seyyed(t-c) 12:00, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Why did you revert without any discussion. This is an important issue and your edit distorted it. Even you didn't pay attention to sources.:-((-- Seyyed(t-c) 13:24, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
 * The explanation is at Ali talk. MP (talk•contribs) 13:26, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Excuse me, I'm not in good mood today. I'll come back later. I hope you can improve the article. And please revert the first two paragraphs which are not written on the basis of the Shia and Sunni views.-- Seyyed(t-c) 13:33, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
 * I put a comment on the talk page to discuss about succession. I hope my anxious manner wouldn't bother you. God bless you.-- Seyyed(t-c) 16:01, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Please refer to the talk page before reverting my edition. Pardon me, I don't want to accuse you, but your edition is a kind of censorship. -- Seyyed(t-c) 15:08, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

My proposal
Hi Mpatel,

Could you please take a look at my proposal here. Thanks in advance, Cheers, --Be happy!! (talk) 09:32, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

New change in WP:MOSISLAM
Salam Alaykum

Two weeks ago I put a comment in the talk page of MOSISLAM and proposed using "The Prophet" in especial cases and about one weeks ago I changed WP:MOSISLAM. Nobody protest or change my proposal. Thus I want to insert it in the related articles.-- Seyyed(t-c) 23:28, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Einstein Field Equations vandalism
The article begins with inserted text 'black holes are nothingness. Black holes are big'. The odd thing is that it does not appear on the edit page. I looked at the HTML source but that gave no insight into where the text is coming from (at the style sheet level, perhaps?).

Just wanted to mention it to someone working with the project. Cyclone77 (talk) 16:17, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

Planck from special relativity
Hi mpatel,

your user page says "Planck's relation between the energy and frequency of a photon can be derived using special relativity" -- but the article on four-vectors that this links to doesn't seem to mention Planck's constant. I don't see how anything involving Planck's constant could be derived from special relativity alone -- and as someone remarked above, Maxwell's electrodynamics are invariant under Lorentz transforms and thus compatible with special relativity. Could you explain what you mean?

Thanks,

Joriki (talk) 05:37, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

At-Tawba 29, Imran (father of Maryam) and Islamic view of Ishmael
Greetings. The reason I placed those items in the general Islam category is because I'm organizing hundreds of WP:UNCAT articles per day. If I attempt to exactly categorize each article, I'll only be able to rescue a fraction of those articles. Further, since there are many topics I'm not well-versed in, if I detail-cat there's a danger that I'll miscategorize. Please don't think of this as "dumping" articles into your section, I'm instead trying to save articles that are floating around lost, and by putting them in the general category I'm letting the people who know that field best decide where to file (or whether to delete) them. Thanks! MatthewVanitas (talk) 14:30, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Greetings!
Hi, M,

Haven't heard from you in some time--- drop me a line when you get a chance, I'd like to catch up!

Chris

WikiProjectIslam Collaboration
Salam bro,

Don't you want to participate in Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Islam. Please participate in collaborative improvement of Sources of Islamic law, which is nominated as GA.

General relativity FAC review
Thanks once more for your helpful comments at the FAC review. Please consider hiding your resolved comments in a cap box template, to make it easier for the FAC directors to consider when all issues have been resolved. Thanks! Markus Poessel (talk) 18:14, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for your edits on the Al-Aqsa Mosque article
Hey. Thanks for your edits to the article. I would like to see that article reach GA status, and its nice to not have to do all the work;-) Have a nice day!-- SJP Chat  02:42, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Hell yeah! I know exactly what you mean:-) I'm thinking of pretty much rewriting the "Significance in Islam" subsection, since that is the part that has issues. I won't be doing any work on the article because I have a shortage of Adderall:-P Cya around.-- SJP Chat  17:38, 6 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Do you mind holding off from improving the Significance in Islam subsection? I'm in the middle of re-writing it. You can re-write it if you really want to, but I would appreciate it if you would wait a little bit before editing it. After I'm perfectly fine if you edit it:-)-- SJP Chat  15:20, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Hadith
Hi Mpatel. How are you? I think you might have restored this material by mistake. In essence it's a long list of primary source material selected by Davehas of unknown significance, which I think adds nothing of encyclopedic value to the article. More discussion can be found on the talk page if you're interested. Regards,  ITAQALLAH   20:17, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

Articles Needing Copy Edit
Hello former LOCE member :)

This is an invitation for you to join a brand-new WikiProject that aims to improve the articles tagged for copy edit. This is pretty important to Wikipedia because there are now over 4,000 such articles, some of which need quite a bit of help. This is not a clone of the LOCE because we will not deal with requests for copy edits, but will happily make improvements to articles at our own pace. If you're interested, sign up at the project page!

Cheers,  Samuel  Tan  02:49, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Battle of the Trench
Salam Alaykum,

I've nominated Battle of the Trench for review here. One of the reviewer asked for copy-editing which I can't do it. Please help me with it. Thanks.-- Seyyed(t-c) 07:26, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Druze
I appear to have misunderstood the Druze Category:Islam issue. Can you clarify? It should be categorised as an Islam page, what am I missing in re format? Thanks,  Ogress  smash!  23:44, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

TfD nomination of Template:Rquote2
Template:Rquote2 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Kaldari (talk) 20:28, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

g-force article
Hi, I noticed you were on the relativity task force, and you'd edited recently.

There's a discussion over at Talk:g-force about whether g-force is a measure of acceleration. Could you cruise over if you have a chance and give your opinion? Many thanks- (User) Wolfkeeper (Talk) 23:34, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Template for Deletion Notice.
Templates_for_deletion is a deletion discussion about a template you have created. ThuranX (talk) 01:27, 21 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Hi Mpatel, at the deletion discussion for the Hadith authenticity template, someone noted that the template is not currently used anywhere. If you've used it in articles in the past, could you make a note of it at the discussion?  Thanks.  --Amble (talk) 04:46, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Just in case you didn't notice.
 21655  ταλκ / 01ҁ 01:10, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

Space Topology
Please read the article you cite ... before writing: Path Topology and the Original Zeeman Topology are not the same ... and it was precisely the objective of Hawking et al. to develop a new topology to overcome some drawbacks of the original Zeeman-proposal. Moreover the original Hawking definitions work as promised only if the under lying manifold is a Lorentzian Manifold with additional constraints .. only then the cite set serve as base. Else you have to invest in some additional definitions or axioms I'm developping a BLOG on the subject -- so if you like - your kindly invited.  Corneliusni (talk) 00:45, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Halilsoy Article
Maybe you can provide some opinion on Articles for deletion/Mustafa Halilsoy, while it is about a person who contributed to field of exact solutions in general relativity. Thank you. --mcyp (talk) 18:42, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

Excessive pictures?
The Quran is beginning to look rather cluttered. The pictures are however, relevant to the article and do help clarify. Do you think its possible to remove one - or both - of the templates to accomadate the large number of pictures? Supertouch (talk) 15:13, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

That's better, but I think if you just removed it altogether and replaced it with a link to the article on Islam at the beginning of the See Also list I think that would be better. Also, removing, in my opinion, the two 'boxes' containing quotes would be better off removed... Just a suggestion... Supertouch (talk) 16:05, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

Looks a lot better! I made a few essentially structural changes as well - tell me what you think. Supertouch (talk) 16:37, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

While I don't necessarily disagree with your choice of "History" as a section heading instead of "History of the Quranic text", it seems to me to be a POV issue. The term "History of the Quran" implies to me - in light of the Toby Lester article in the Atlantic - is POV as it implies that the Quran we have today went thru an evolution until becoming what it is today, whereas "History of the Quranic Text seems much more neutral. At the same time, I recognize that this might not be as apparent to someone who hasn't read the article... You seem much more in touch with the Quran page so tell me what you think is more appropriate... Supertouch (talk) 16:01, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

Mosque
Can you please not revert my edits.--Ghamay (talk) 19:47, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Log/2010 January 16
Hi. We need some help on Islam-related AfDs. Could you take a look at these? - Richard Cavell (talk) 15:42, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

Copyedit Backlog Elimination Drive
Hi, as a member of the Guild of Copy Editors you're hereby notified of and invited to participate in the WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Backlog elimination drives/May 2010. Please help us eliminate the 8,000+ copyedit backlog! Participating editors will receive barnstars and other awards, according to their level of participation. ɳorɑfʈ Talk! 00:06, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

Grab some glory, and a barnstar
Hi, I'd like to invite you to participate in the Guild of Copy Editors July 2010 Backlog Elimination Drive. In May, about 30 editors helped remove the tag from 1175 articles. The backlog is still over 7500 articles, and extends back to the beginning of 2008! We really need your help to reduce it. Copyediting just a couple articles can qualify you for a barnstar. Serious copyeditors can win prestigious and exclusive rewards. See the event page for more information. And thanks for your consideration. ɳorɑfʈ Talk! 15:02, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much for signing up for the July Backlog Elimination Drive! The copyedit backlog stretches back two and a half years, all the way back to the beginning of 2008! We're really going to need all the help we can muster to get it down to a manageable number. We've ambitiously set a goal of clearing all of 2008 from the backlog this month. In order to do that, we're going to need more participants. Is there anyone that you can invite or ask to participate with you? If so, we're offering an award to the person who brings in the most referrals. Just notify ɳorɑfʈ  Talk! or  Diannaa  TALK of who your referrals are. Once again, thanks for your support! -- Diannaa  TALK 14:47, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 00:31, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

Backlog Elimination Drive Has Begun
Hello, I just wanted to take a moment and announce that the July 2010 Backlog Elimination Drive has started, and will run for a month. Thanks for signing up. There's a special prize for most edits on the first day, in case you've got high ambitions. Enjoy! ɳorɑfʈ Talk! 04:14, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

Reminder
Hi! This message is just a friendly reminder that you signed up to participate in the GOCE Backlog Elimination Drive. I noticed that you haven't logged a single copy edit yet. We'd love to see you participate! The drive runs three more weeks so there's still plenty of time to earn barnstars. Thanks! -- Diannaa (Talk) 22:29, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

GOCE Backlog Elimination Drive Wrap-up
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of The Utahraptor at 18:14, 1 August 2010 (UTC).

November 2010 backlog elimination drive update
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of The Utahraptor (talk) at 16:26, 14 November 2010 (UTC).

GOCE elections
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors via SMasters using AWB on 01:52, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

November 2010 Backlog Elimination Drive Conclusion
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors at 23:50, 2 December 2010 (UTC).

Nomination for deletion of Template:Mosques in Hong Kong
Template:Mosques in Hong Kong has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Mhiji (talk) 14:54, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

GOCE Year-end Report
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 06:34, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Exact Solutions in General Relativity
Template:Exact Solutions in General Relativity has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. — This, that, and the other (talk) 23:52, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

GOCE drive news
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors at 20:30, 16 January 2011 (UTC).

GOCE January Backlog elimination drive conclusion
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors at 15:30, 5 February 2011 (UTC).

Nomination for deletion of Template:Science of Hadith
Template:Science of Hadith has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. — This, that, and the other (talk) 06:57, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference
Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion, guidelines for use at WP:MINOR). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to  in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and all users will still be able to manually mark their edits as being minor in the usual way.

For well-established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 20:35, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

GOCE drive newsletter
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 07:52, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

GOCE elections
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 08:00, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

GOCE drive invitation
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 09:17, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

Categories of Hadith
I noticed you were removing the Category:Islam from this article, without citing any reason for the same. Please discuss this on the Talk page first. Thanks. Shaad lko (talk) 05:00, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

Talkback
Shaad lko (talk) 06:30, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

GOCE drive newsletter
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 16:48, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Hadith authenticity
Template:Hadith authenticity has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 23:57, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

GOCE drive newsletter
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 01:47, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Islah (concept)


The article Islah (concept) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * The corresponding Dab contains the only encyclopedia-worthy content this article has seen in its more than six years' existence. If its prose content can be expanded beyond a dictdef, it's high time to do so.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jerzy•t 05:16, 15 December 2011 (UTC) Timestamp: 20111215044412

GOCE newsletter
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 11:05, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

GOCE 2011 Year-End Report
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 06:36, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Main page appearance: General relativity
This is a note to let the main editors of General relativity know that the article will be appearing as today's featured article on April 19, 2012. You can view the TFA blurb at Today's featured article/April 19, 2012. If you prefer that the article appear as TFA on a different date, or not at all, please ask featured article director or his delegate, or start a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/requests. If the previous blurb needs tweaking, you might change it—following the instructions at Today's featured article/requests/instructions. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. The blurb as it stands now is below:



General relativity is the geometric theory of gravitation published by Albert Einstein in 1916. It is the current description of gravitation in modern physics. General relativity generalises special relativity and Newton's law of universal gravitation, providing a unified description of gravity as a geometric property of space and time. In particular, the curvature of spacetime is directly related to the four-momentum of whatever matter and radiation are present. The relation is specified by the Einstein field equations. Some predictions of general relativity differ significantly from those of classical physics. Examples of such differences include gravitational time dilation, gravitational lensing, the gravitational redshift of light, and the gravitational time delay. General relativity's predictions have been confirmed in all observations and experiments to date. Although general relativity is not the only relativistic theory of gravity, it is the simplest theory that is consistent with experimental data. However, unanswered questions remain, the most fundamental being how general relativity can be reconciled with the laws of quantum physics to produce a complete and self-consistent theory of quantum gravity. (more...) UcuchaBot (talk) 23:02, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Black Stone
The article Black Stone you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Black Stone for comments about the article. Well done! There is a backlog of articles waiting for review, why not help out and review a nominated article yourself? GoP T C N 08:47, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

Topology and Physical Cosmology
Hi Mpatel,

You've written that the study of space-time topology is very important for the field of physical cosmology. Could you elaborate? What is it about space-time topology that is so relevant to cosmology in general, and in particular to physical cosmology? Thanks for any thoughts --- Sofsonline (talk) 11:27, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Mosques in Canada
Template:Mosques in Canada has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.

Proposed deletion of Exact solution


The article Exact solution has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * The article consists solely of a definition for a term whose meaning follows from the usual meanings of the words "exact" and "solution".

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RockMagnetist (talk) 20:24, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 22
Hi. When you recently edited Zayd ibn Thabit, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Muhajir (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:21, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Category:Islamic terms
Category:Islamic terms, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 21:59, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 31
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Quran, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Huda (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:38, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Anis Shorrosh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Evangelist (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:56, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

MOS:ISLAM update guidelines to include standard reference source
Hi, We now have standard consistent sources to refer to, can we add this guideline in MOS:ISLAM 1)SUNNAH.COM 2)QURAN.COM

All primary references should come only from these two sources for consistency. I have seen many hadith in wikipedia which are wrongly quoted with incorrect ref name, this will make it easy to verify. http://sunnah.com/bukhari/53/9 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Summichum (talk • contribs) 19:32, 17 April 2014 (UTC)