User talk:Mpatzekov

Speedy deletion nomination of Founterior


A tag has been placed on Founterior, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here.  DGG ( talk ) 23:41, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Great. Wish you the same - somebody to destroy all tour work simply on personal decision. Great. I only wanted to know what was wrong with the article.

Talk page post
If you were the IP poster of the now deleted talk page of the article, I would advise you that making threats of legal action normally brings instant blocking of the account concerned. If you were not the poster, perhaps you may know who it was and pass this warning on to them. I would also advise that no entity has any 'legal right' to have an article on Wikipedia as it is a private site governed by its own rules. There is no 'fair play for all' rule, and indeed we have a policy WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. The article was considered as being promotional by a very experienced administrator, and I agreed with him and deleted it. There are articles about many other brands, yes. These articles are, in the main, about not by their subjects. If you find any of them promotional, please let us know. Occasionally things do get past the patrollers, only to be found later. We do not allow the use of Wikipedia for the purposes of advertising or promotion. As I said above, this message is aimed at the poster using an IP address on the talk page contesting deletion. I can only assume that this poster was someone from inside the company or an agency working for the company. Peridon (talk) 12:46, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Would you rather be deleted by bot? We base our decisions on experience and policy. Do you think that something like "It turns out that Founterior is a really helpful adviser for those who are planning to rearrange their homes following some new and trendy ideas. It is also a great source for inspirational images and ideas for people who like to bring different accents in their living areas." has a place in an encyclopaedia, where people come to find neutral and unbiased information? And even worse - "And so the passion became an inspiration and later a business model that is focused mainly on one purpose – to make the readers and those who need an advice comfortable with the magazine and be able to find what they really need. It's all about the people and their needs.". That's fine on a company website, in a directory, or on somewhere like Facebook. 'Passsion' in particular is a killer, unless one is talking about Good Friday or fruit. Anyway, look at WP:CORP about corporate notability and WP:RS about reliable sources - not Facebook etc, forums, the company site, wikis, PRWire etc, any sort of profile, anything where the company supplied the info (including certain 'interviews with the boss' where he/she talks in buzzwords), or mere mentions. Read other articles - use the 'random page' (top left, fifth button down) to get an idea of neutral wording. If you find anything using passion (except as above), leverage (unless in an engineering context), focused (except lenses etc), or similar PR talk, please let us know. There are between four and five million articles here and odd things slip through (but get caught up with later...). If you think you stand a chance (and I would point out that the vast majority of companies don't get articles), build it round the references, imagine you aren't connected to the company but this is a college coursework piece, be as boringly neutral as you can, and put it at User:Mpatzekov/DRAFT. There, it's safe except for promotionality, hoax, attack or copyright violation. Ask for advice before relaunching it. BTW on Wikipedia, we work downwards on talk pages. Indent to show a new post with : at the start (or however many are needed), and please sign with ~ which may sound silly, but it puts your sig and the datestamp on like this: Peridon (talk) 22:40, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Mpatzekov (talk) 08:06, 7 October 2014 (UTC) Despite my emotional reaction, I am grateful for your detailed feedback. I will rework the article and transform it in order to meet Wikipedia's criteria and will publish it again. It's always a pleasure to talk to a real person rather than managing with bots.

Mpatzekov (talk) 15:54, 20 October 2014 (UTC) I have edited the article and saved it in User:Mpatzekov/DRAFT. May I ask you to have a quick look at it and tell me your thoughts whether it can be published at Wikipedia.com/Founterior or not? Your help is much appreciated!