User talk:Mpcpro

Welcome!

Hello, Mpcpro, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Ralph Cupper, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Burhan Ahmed (talk • contribs) 04:39, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Ralph Cupper


A tag has been placed on Ralph Cupper requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Burhan Ahmed (talk • contribs) 04:39, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Hello there, I am going to delete this article I'm afraid because it doesn't claim any of the criteria at WP:MUSICBIO. If any of these criteria can be met with reliable sources to back the claim up, then the article can be reinstated of course. Please message me here if you need any help with this. Kim Dent-Brown   (Talk)  09:12, 1 January 2011 (UTC)


 * If you see here: http://home.online.no/~iahaugen/cdralph&inge2.html the CD: White cliffs of dover has been reviewed by 5 Norwegian Newspapers in West Norway, and if you contact any of those newspapers they will say the CD legit. So he can then claim some of the criteria at WP:MUSICBIO. It says there it only needs one, and since making CDs and being published about it in newspapers is one of them, you should reinstate this topic. - MPC
 * Hello again, just finishing brunch and didn't want you to think I was ignoring you! Will message here again shortly. By the way, if you end your messages with Insert non-formatted text here~ your signature and timestamp will magically appear - like this! Kim Dent-Brown   (Talk)  11:31, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
 * OK, I have restored the article to your user space here so you can work on it to try and make it viable here. Note that this is not in the main article space of Wikipedia, and so it won't appear on searches (and will also be much less likely to be tagged for deletion). I'll make some suggestions which may be helpful but I don't want to raise your hopes too much as I still suspect that as it stands the article would be deleted by any other admin who saw it.
 * One problem was that no claims for notability were made. WP:MUSICBIO requires that the subject has been written about in depth by a number of independent sources. I couldn't check the links you gave above as they all go to an individual website which has copied the articles, rather than to the originals themselves. Also, I can't read Norwegian and can only recognise a few words! However the articles seemed to be local newspaper reviews of a single CD. This gives us a second problem that the sources are not in English which is not fatal but means some translations will need to be done.
 * The articles you linked all seemed to be reviews of a single CD, rather than articles about Ralph Cupper himself. As it stands, the only sources you have would be for an article that says something like "Ralph Cupper co-performed with Inge Haugen on a CD called Evergreens Volume 2: The White Cliffs of Dover which was released in Norway in 2004." The sources you have are more relevant to the CD than to the performers - as far as I can see they don't say anything about them. For example, there are no sources to confirm any of the details of Cupper's background, training, career etc.
 * If he really is a notable musician (notable in the limited Wikipedia sense I mean!) then he will have multiple sources describing his career, like Leif Ove Andsnes for example. If the information in the article can't be linked to an independent source then ultimately the subject is not sustainable. However all this is only my opinion; one option is to work on the article more, find the sources and then ask other editors for comments - you could do this by following the instructions at WP:RFC. Alternatively if you simply disagree with my assessment of the article altogether, you can simply repost the material into main space at Ralph Cupper and take your chances, but I would advise trying to strengthen it first. Please just reply here if you have any queries, I'll keep this page on my watchlist. Kim Dent-Brown   (Talk)  12:22, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Hey. Sorry I could not answer, I was at work. The only source I can find about someone posting about his history was a newspaper article in paper form written by Fjordabladet. Will it be valid if I somehow scanned in the article and uploaded the article so you could check it? Mpcpro (talk) 17:18, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
 * No, there's no need to scan the original - we take it on trust that offline sources exist and are as stated! What would be helpful would be if you could type in a transcript (Norwegian with English translation) of the article or at least the bits of it you want to use to use to support details of his career. I don't suppose there's an archive link to the article at www.fjordabladet.no/is there? Copy anything you have (text, links etc) to the talk page for the article you are drafting and we can take it from there. Kim Dent-Brown   (Talk)  18:25, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The problem with www.fjordabladet.no is that they started their webpage in 2007: http://www.fjordabladet.no/index.cfm?event=doLink&famId=84281&page=29 You can see there the first article is from that time. And everything before that is in written form which have not been written on that webpage, and the article in question was written before this time and has not been uploaded. There are however other articles about Ralph Cupper after 2007 which are uploaded: http://www.fjordabladet.no/index.cfm?event=search&searchfield=cupper&x=0&y=0  but they do not talk about his history. About translating bits of the article. I have already translated a lot of it and the history you see in the Ralph Cupper page was indeed from that article. Mpcpro (talk) 18:52, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I couldn't see any citation of the news item you mention in the original Wikipedia article; the only citation there was one about charity work. Is this the same one? What you need to do is (a) transcribe the relevant bits of the newspaper item onto the talk page of the draft, in Norwegian and English please. Then (b) cite that item appropriately in the relevant parts of the article itself. You need to use a format like this:
 * So to give you a made up example:
 * If that is inserted into the text of the article it will give you a nice near reference at the end automatically. I know it will be a bit of a pain to find the Norwegian text and translate it, but you have chosen a difficult subject to write about because this is the English Wikipedia and all your sources seem to be Norwegian! Please not, I'm still of the opinion that this article probably does not establish sufficient notability, but I won't delete it myself if/when you repost it, we'll leave that up to uninvolved others. meanwhile I'll give you the best help I can! Kim Dent-Brown   (Talk)  20:32, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
 * If that is inserted into the text of the article it will give you a nice near reference at the end automatically. I know it will be a bit of a pain to find the Norwegian text and translate it, but you have chosen a difficult subject to write about because this is the English Wikipedia and all your sources seem to be Norwegian! Please not, I'm still of the opinion that this article probably does not establish sufficient notability, but I won't delete it myself if/when you repost it, we'll leave that up to uninvolved others. meanwhile I'll give you the best help I can! Kim Dent-Brown   (Talk)  20:32, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
 * If that is inserted into the text of the article it will give you a nice near reference at the end automatically. I know it will be a bit of a pain to find the Norwegian text and translate it, but you have chosen a difficult subject to write about because this is the English Wikipedia and all your sources seem to be Norwegian! Please not, I'm still of the opinion that this article probably does not establish sufficient notability, but I won't delete it myself if/when you repost it, we'll leave that up to uninvolved others. meanwhile I'll give you the best help I can! Kim Dent-Brown   (Talk)  20:32, 1 January 2011 (UTC)


 * The only citation I did was about the charity work. Since this was my first wikipedia page I am a bit unsure when to use citations so that is why I did not use a citation when writing about the article from the newspaper since I thought only internet links were valid as citation devices or books. So would it help if I repost the Ralph Cupper article and add 2 citations. The first one being from the newspaper article about his history, and the other one, being about the CD's from that link I posted earlier on? What do you think? Mpcpro (talk) 21:31, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Sound good - citations don't have to be exclusively from sources available on the web - though of course that's helpful because people can go straight to them if they want. But a source can be a book, radio broadcast, newspaper article - anything you like! Have a look at WP:RS and WP:CITE to learn more about sources and citations. In principle, the more sources and the more often you cite them, the better. Kim Dent-Brown   (Talk)  22:53, 1 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Hey. I have edited and added the references, could you take a look at it at my user space before I finally repost it? Just to check that I got everything in order reference wise. Mpcpro (talk) 05:32, 2 January 2011 (UTC)


 * I added one more reference. So could you just message me after you have taken a look at it? Then I'll repost it and hope that everything goes well. Mpcpro (talk) 00:42, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ralph Cupper


A tag has been placed on Ralph Cupper requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you.  Teapot  george Talk  20:43, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

Battlegrounds 2
Hi Mpcpro, I've had a quick look around for references for this article, but haven't been able to find anything that satisfies our requirements for reliable secondary sources (WP:RS). What other sources do you have other than Steam (a primary source)? The installation guide will probably be removed since Wikipedia is not a how-to guide (WP:NOTGUIDE). Marasmusine (talk) 21:56, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

Hi Mpcpro, the sites you mention are all primary sources. That is, pages maintained by the makers of the mod or people directly affiliated with them. Wikipedia articles need to be based on secondary sources, such as reviews in magazines. Marasmusine (talk) 08:13, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

Hi, I'm sorry but those additional links aren't satisfactory either. I can go into more detail if you wish. Marasmusine (talk) 09:49, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

The ModDB 2005 "editors choice" might be enough for verification in the "List of" article. Maybe. ModDB is currently not accepted by the videogames wikiproject as a reliable source (see WP:VG/RS), but that's more on the basis of the user-generated content rather than the editorials. I may have to raise the subject again for a clearer concensus. Gaming Daily is a self-published source, which are not normally usable. If we can establish that Ed Fenning is an "expert in his field", then it's a possibility. Marasmusine (talk) 10:45, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:The Battlegrounds 2 Logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:The Battlegrounds 2 Logo.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is [ a list of your uploads]. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 03:04, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:The Battlegrounds 2 Logo.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:The Battlegrounds 2 Logo.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is [ a list of your uploads].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Eeekster (talk) 03:24, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 03:31, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:The Battlegrounds 2 Logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:The Battlegrounds 2 Logo.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 23:17, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Battlegrounds 2


The article Battlegrounds 2 has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The1337gamer (talk) 14:56, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Battlegrounds 2 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Battlegrounds 2 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Battlegrounds 2 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The1337gamer (talk) 19:30, 17 May 2015 (UTC)