User talk:Mpetriewfg

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

WFG
I have reverted most of your edits to the WFG article, save some copyedits. I'm doing this because WFG has been a contentious article and several of us believe we have successfully reached a balance of views regarding WFG's legitimacy. Due to past controversies, and the rather biased nature of your edits (specifically, removing all negative views which, being sourced, constitutes a form of vandalism, and the insertion of positive views which are themselves unsourced), I'm reverting. We encourage you to present your views, and relevant sources, at the article's talk page where we can attempt to determine a consensus-based neutral point of view for the article. Thanks! &mdash; Lomn | Talk / RfC 21:26, 15 September 2005 (UTC)

WFG, continued
See above for most of the answers, and cross-reference with WP:NPOV for our policy on balancing points of view. As for "formerly known as WLG", that does appear to be incorrect (it's certainly contradictory with the latter part of the article). Most of our involvement has been, as above, the reversion of overly biased edits. &mdash; Lomn Talk 03:03, 18 January 2006 (UTC)