User talk:Mphil02

Welcome!
Hello, Mphil02, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Mphil02/sandbox, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.
 * Article development
 * Standard layout
 * Lead section
 * The perfect article
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Drm310 🍁 (talk) 13:51, 28 May 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Mphil02/sandbox


A tag has been placed on User:Mphil02/sandbox, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.
 * It appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement of https://www.f6s.com/company/havity-pay. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 13:51, 28 May 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:HAVITY GROUP


A tag has been placed on Draft:HAVITY GROUP, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Schminnte (talk • contribs) 14:41, 28 May 2023 (UTC)

Contesting the speed deletion of the havity group and havity pay page
This page is not unambiguously promotional because it maintains a neutral tone, focuses on providing general information about Havity Pay, presents a comprehensive coverage of the company's offerings, ensures information accuracy, and serves a general purpose of educating and informing readers. It adheres to the principles of objective reporting and provides valuable information without resorting to overtly promotional tactics.

Neutral tone: The article maintains a neutral tone throughout, presenting information about Havity Pay in an objective manner without excessive exaggeration or promotional language. For example, the article does not claim that Havity Pay is the "best" or "most affordable" payment gateway on the market. Instead, it simply provides information about the company's features and benefits. In Details

Information focus: The article focuses on providing general information about Havity Pay, its services, and its impact on businesses. It does not excessively highlight specific product features or benefits in an attempt to manipulate readers into making a purchase. For example, the article does not include a list of testimonials from satisfied customers. Instead, it focuses on providing objective information about the company's offerings.

Comprehensive coverage: The article covers various aspects of Havity Pay, including its simplification of payment processes, emphasis on security, affordability, integration capabilities, and customer-centric approach. It presents a well-rounded view of the company's offerings. For example, the article discusses how Havity Pay can help businesses to simplify their payment processes and improve their security. It also discusses the company's affordable pricing and its integration capabilities.

The article is not intended to solely promote Havity Pay but rather to present an objective assessment of its position in the market. For example, the article discusses how Havity Pay is different from other payment gateways in terms of its focus on security and affordability.

Information accuracy: The article strives to provide accurate and reliable information about Havity Pay, its services, and its impact. It avoids making unsubstantiated claims or exaggerations, focusing on presenting verifiable information. For example, the article cites sources to support its claims about Havity Pay's features and benefits.

General purpose: The article is written with the intention of providing general information about Havity Pay to a wide range of readers. It aims to educate and inform rather than serve as a promotional piece targeting a specific audience for commercial gain. For example, the article does not include a call to action urging readers to sign up for a Havity Pay account. Instead, it simply provides information about the company's offerings so that readers can make an informed decision about whether or not to use its services. Mphil02 (talk) 15:06, 28 May 2023 (UTC)


 * [[Image:Information.svg|25px]] You appear to have a close connection to the subject on Wikipedia that raises concerns about a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged.

Anyone with a conflict of interest must avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing articles related to you, your family or colleagues, your organization or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with,
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors,
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam);
 * and you must always:
 * 1) avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

Note that you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure. Even if you are not being paid, you are expected to disclose any close connection with the subject of the article, using the connected contributor template.

For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Conflict of Interest. Thank you. Deb (talk) 15:33, 28 May 2023 (UTC)