User talk:Mpmuts

File:Faeries-aire.gif
I don't know how, but when you uploaded this image, you marked it as being only for noncommercial use. Images without permission for commercial use are not accepted at Wikipedia. Thanks for marking it with an acceptable permissions template! Nyttend (talk) 02:06, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

Faeries' Aire
Hi. Well, the need is to show significant coverage in reliable sources. Blogs and forums are not normally accepted as reliable sources; certainly not forums. Some blogs are but usually only if they come under some kind of editorial control, such as those under the auspices of a major newpaper or media outlet. Has the work been discussed anywhere at all other than in blogs and forums? An alternative is to incorporate it into an article about a wider topic. The obvious one is a biography of John Stump. Is there significant coverage of John Stump in reliable sources? Unfortunately, John Stump is a not uncommon name so I can't see anything in a search but perhaps you might know of some coverage somewhere? --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:17, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Faerie's Aire and Death Waltz
A tag has been placed on Faerie's Aire and Death Waltz, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 21:06, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Faeries-aire.gif listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Faeries-aire.gif, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 21:16, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Faerie's Aire and Death Waltz for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article Faerie's Aire and Death Waltz, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Faerie's Aire and Death Waltz until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 21:25, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Faeries-aire.gif
Thanks for uploading File:Faeries-aire.gif. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 05:36, 29 September 2010 (UTC)